2002
DOI: 10.1006/jmcc.2002.2041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sarcoplasmic Reticulum K+ Channels from Human and Sheep Atrial Cells Display a Specific Electro-pharmacological Profile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports suggest that SR K + channels exhibit a single sub-conductance state of approximately 60–70 % of the fully open state. This sub-state has often been described as messy or noisy and there are quite wide variations in the reported amplitudes of the sub-conductance state [6, 10, 15, 19, 22, 26, 27]. We suggest that the noisy gating of this reported 60–70 % sub-conductance state actually reflects the rapid transitions between multiple sub-conductance states of the TRIC channels (see Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Previous reports suggest that SR K + channels exhibit a single sub-conductance state of approximately 60–70 % of the fully open state. This sub-state has often been described as messy or noisy and there are quite wide variations in the reported amplitudes of the sub-conductance state [6, 10, 15, 19, 22, 26, 27]. We suggest that the noisy gating of this reported 60–70 % sub-conductance state actually reflects the rapid transitions between multiple sub-conductance states of the TRIC channels (see Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In 2008, we showed that RyRs conduct their own countercurrent (4). Before that, the needed countercurrent was generally believed to be mediated by the SR K þ channel (8)(9)(10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ion channels with rather similar properties were described in the membranes of the sarcoplasmic reticulum [7]. The cited authors, however, were also unable to classify these channels as belonging to one well-known cationic channel type or another.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%