2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11901-020-00515-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sarcopenia in Liver Transplantation: an Update

Abstract: Purpose of Review Patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) are at high risk of sarcopenia and associated physical frailty. This review summarises advances in our knowledge of the definition, assessment, clinical implications and management of sarcopenia in LT. Recent Findings Sarcopenia is associated with increased mortality, morbidity, physical disability and poor quality of life both before and after LT. Assessment tools have evolved from solely relying on imaging (i.e. muscle area only) to reproducibl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sarcopenia as defined by SMI is widely regarded as a surrogate endpoint reflecting mortality, morbidity, physical disability and poor quality of life both before and after LT; accordingly, the importance of adequate nutrition and exercise therapy for multilateral management of sarcopenia has also been emphasized. 25,26 However, these previous studies mainly focused on the effect of the recipient's sarcopenia on the surgical outcomes. In contrast, our study has clinical significance as the first major investigation of the association between donor SMI and surgical outcomes such as graft failure and mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sarcopenia as defined by SMI is widely regarded as a surrogate endpoint reflecting mortality, morbidity, physical disability and poor quality of life both before and after LT; accordingly, the importance of adequate nutrition and exercise therapy for multilateral management of sarcopenia has also been emphasized. 25,26 However, these previous studies mainly focused on the effect of the recipient's sarcopenia on the surgical outcomes. In contrast, our study has clinical significance as the first major investigation of the association between donor SMI and surgical outcomes such as graft failure and mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kalafateli et al 15 reported that sarcopenia in LT recipients was a predictor of post‐operative morbidity and mortality regardless of the MELD score. Sarcopenia as defined by SMI is widely regarded as a surrogate endpoint reflecting mortality, morbidity, physical disability and poor quality of life both before and after LT; accordingly, the importance of adequate nutrition and exercise therapy for multilateral management of sarcopenia has also been emphasized 25,26 . However, these previous studies mainly focused on the effect of the recipient's sarcopenia on the surgical outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seeing to the functional capacity a possible explanation for the reduction might be related to the loss of muscle mass in cirrhosis patients; however, the reduction in functional capacity may also be caused by the decrease in mitochondrial oxidative capacity and/or the number of mitochondria in the muscle tissue. Liver Dysfunction leads to protein and fat mal-absorption and hyper catabolic state [12]. So, Energy depletion when associated with physical inactivity lead to functional deterioration and hence Body Mass Index (BMI) is also found to be reduced in pre liver Transplant Recipients.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concurrent presence of NAFLD and sarcopenia led to a far worse dysglycemia and insulin resistance [12]. Sarcopenia, in turn, is a strong predictor of poor post-liver transplant outcomes ranging from a longer hospital stay, need for mechanical ventilation, intensive care, an increased risk of infection, etc., [13,14]. The potential targetable actors or at what stage of NAFLD the loss of skeletal muscle starts the vicious circle are still matters of debate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%