2017 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Control (ICAC3) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icac3.2017.8318782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sarcasmometer using sentiment analysis and topic modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Naive Bayes [43], [36], [44], [35], [45], [46], [47] SVM [40], [44], [35], [48], [49], [50], [51], [ 3) Approach: A variety of methods have been done with many varieties of techniques, including statistical models, sentiment analysis, pattern recognition, supervised or unsupervised machine learning [57]. The supervised and semi-supervised approach is used for building a model to classify data through a statistical and logical process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naive Bayes [43], [36], [44], [35], [45], [46], [47] SVM [40], [44], [35], [48], [49], [50], [51], [ 3) Approach: A variety of methods have been done with many varieties of techniques, including statistical models, sentiment analysis, pattern recognition, supervised or unsupervised machine learning [57]. The supervised and semi-supervised approach is used for building a model to classify data through a statistical and logical process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e approach achieved 80% accuracy in sarcasm identification. Bhan and D'silva [25] suggested a system to measure sarcasm using different algorithms such as Naive Bayes, logistic regression, and linear regression where scores generated for each algorithm were compared to present the most efficient way. e linear SVC model obtained precision, recall, and F-score values of 0.86, 0.87, and 0.86, respectively.…”
Section: Literature Survey On Sarcasm Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e polarity and sentiment score for these tweets are analyzed using TextBlob and NLTK. e change in mood 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Accuracy (%) State-of-the-art approaches Mukherjee et al [25] Mazen et al [24] Jihen et al [21] Jayasanka et al [56] Rajadesingan et al [34] Proposed work Figure 9: Comparison of the proposed system with existing approaches. Figure 10: Sarcastic type classification based on proposed multi-rule approach.…”
Section: Modelling User's Mood Changementioning
confidence: 99%