2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10462-019-09791-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sarcasm identification in textual data: systematic review, research challenges and open directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this, Mahlawi and Sasi [77] found that, from the large number of Enron email datasets, data are extracted by using NLP and sentiment analysis to make them available in a structured format. Furthermore, the authors Eke, Norman, Shuib, and Nweke [78] noted that the other parts of NLP are also important. In that, lexical analysis and ML-based emotional behavior detected from the text messages were used to check the level of criticism or hurt level from the Sarcasm dataset.…”
Section: Study Reference Domain Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, Mahlawi and Sasi [77] found that, from the large number of Enron email datasets, data are extracted by using NLP and sentiment analysis to make them available in a structured format. Furthermore, the authors Eke, Norman, Shuib, and Nweke [78] noted that the other parts of NLP are also important. In that, lexical analysis and ML-based emotional behavior detected from the text messages were used to check the level of criticism or hurt level from the Sarcasm dataset.…”
Section: Study Reference Domain Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The summary of the related work is depicted in Table 2 . A detailed analysis of the feature engineering techniques employed in sarcasm classification tasks can be found in a systematic literature review conducted in [ 25 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study would similarly utilise Reddit to develop a novel corpus of sarcastic utterances for the purpose of training an algorithm to detect sarcasm. It appears that in the vast majority of cases, researchers use either an existing corpus of sarcastic utterances (Ghosh et al, 2018;Ghosh et al, 2020) such as the one compiled by Khodak et al (2018), or more commonly according to Eke et al (2019), they gather their own unique data to use just in their study (Avvaru et al, 2020;Ghosh et al, 2020;Ren et al, 2018). These corpora generally tend to be considerably smaller (e.g.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%