The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.5391/ijfis.2022.22.4.401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sarcasm Detection in Twitter - Performance Impact While Using Data Augmentation: Word Embeddings

Abstract: Sarcasm is the use of words commonly used to ridicule someone or for humorous purposes. Several studies on sarcasm detection have utilized different learning algorithms. However, most of these learning models have always focused on the contents of expression only, thus leaving the contextual information in isolation. As a result, they failed to capture the contextual information in the sarcastic expression. Moreover, some datasets used in several studies have an unbalanced dataset, thus impacting the model res… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, augmenting by only replacing one word with the synonym could potentially generate synthetic data that is very similar to the original one, thus risking overfitting the model. In earlier works, Handoyo et al [21] augmented the data by only changing one word to its synonym. demonstrate the overfitting effects, which cause performance to decline as more augmented data are used.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, augmenting by only replacing one word with the synonym could potentially generate synthetic data that is very similar to the original one, thus risking overfitting the model. In earlier works, Handoyo et al [21] augmented the data by only changing one word to its synonym. demonstrate the overfitting effects, which cause performance to decline as more augmented data are used.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%