2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12603-019-1222-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SARC-F Validation and SARC-F+EBM Derivation in Musculoskeletal Disease: The SPSS-OK Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of either of these in a patient's The low to moderate sensitivity and high specificity of SARC-F as a screening tool for sarcopenia has been described previously [6,8]. It has been suggested that the addition of calf circumference [27], age and BMI [28] may improve the diagnostic accuracy of the SARC-F tool for EWGSOP2 sarcopenia. SARC-F has also been shown to have higher sensitivity for EWGSOP2 sarcopenia in older patients with hip fracture [29], perhaps due to the higher prevalence of sarcopenia in this group (37%) compared to that typically seen in community-dwelling samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of either of these in a patient's The low to moderate sensitivity and high specificity of SARC-F as a screening tool for sarcopenia has been described previously [6,8]. It has been suggested that the addition of calf circumference [27], age and BMI [28] may improve the diagnostic accuracy of the SARC-F tool for EWGSOP2 sarcopenia. SARC-F has also been shown to have higher sensitivity for EWGSOP2 sarcopenia in older patients with hip fracture [29], perhaps due to the higher prevalence of sarcopenia in this group (37%) compared to that typically seen in community-dwelling samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…can be exempt from this screening tool. The validity of the Japanese version of the SARC-F has been reported in a previous study [ 21 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“… 11 Geriatric working groups, such as the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 and the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia, recommend using the SARC‐F before carrying out confirmatory testing 9,10 . The SARC‐F has a high ability to diagnose sarcopenia among residents of nursing homes and long‐term care facilities (specificity 78.7–98.4%); 12,13 and in the present study, a validated Japanese version of the SARC‐F was used 14 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%