2016
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2015.2506659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SAR Target Configuration Recognition Using Tensor Global and Local Discriminant Embedding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those features are then used to produce a shared dictionary and a class dictionary. Specifically, the two learned dictionary can be obtained by solving the low-rank dictionary learning model in Equation (9). Given a query sample y, the monogenic feature of the query sample can be represented by χ(y).…”
Section: Implementation Of Target Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those features are then used to produce a shared dictionary and a class dictionary. Specifically, the two learned dictionary can be obtained by solving the low-rank dictionary learning model in Equation (9). Given a query sample y, the monogenic feature of the query sample can be represented by χ(y).…”
Section: Implementation Of Target Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional target recognition method, i.e., template-based strategy [8], is ineffective under EOCs, as slight changes in configuration or occlusions may give rise to significantly different scattering phenomenology, thus it is hard to quantify the similarity of targets between the templates and the query sample. To enhance the performance of target recognition, some feature-based methods are proposed to characterize SAR images, such as global or local structure descriptors [9][10][11], attributed scattering centers [12,13] and filer banks [3,14]. In recent years, the monogenic signal, which is a multidimensional analytic signal, is employed to characterize SAR images due to its rotation-invariance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAR ATR algorithms that are based on machine learning methods can be further divided into two types, i.e., feature-based methods and deep learning methods. Feature-based methods [8,9] require features to be manually extracted from SAR images, while deep learning methods automatically extract features from SAR images. Thus, deep learning methods avoid the designing of feature extractors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the main objective of feature extraction is to find a low-dimensional representation of a SAR image that could distinguishably represent the target. Different features have been explored to characterize the target signal [4,5], such as scattering centre features [6,7], filter bank features [3,8], pattern structure features [9,10] and statistical features [1,11]. Recently, low-rank matrix factorization (LMF), a particularly useful technique for data representation, has been developed for SAR ATR [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%