2015
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2015.2419371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SAR Ship Detection and Self-Reporting Data Fusion Based on Traffic Knowledge

Abstract: The improvement in Maritime Situational Awareness, the capability of understanding events, circumstances, and activities within and impacting the maritime environment, is nowadays of paramount importance for safety and security. The integration of spaceborne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data and automatic identification system (AIS) information has the appealing potential to provide a better picture of what is happening at sea by detecting vessels that are not reporting their positioning data or, on the othe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, with the higher resolution of the SAR image, the sea clutter becomes complex in the time and spatial domains, and then the existing models are not suitable, resulting in the severe degradation of the CFAR detection performance and many false alarms [4]. Additionally, the parameter estimation is complex, and the threshold cannot be acquired easily [5].To overcome the drawbacks of the CFAR method, ship detection methods based on new features have been studied by researchers, and many results has been achieved [6][7][8]. For example, based on Cloude decomposition, Wang et al [9] used the local uniformity of the third eigenvalue of a polarization coherence matrix (T) to detect ships.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, with the higher resolution of the SAR image, the sea clutter becomes complex in the time and spatial domains, and then the existing models are not suitable, resulting in the severe degradation of the CFAR detection performance and many false alarms [4]. Additionally, the parameter estimation is complex, and the threshold cannot be acquired easily [5].To overcome the drawbacks of the CFAR method, ship detection methods based on new features have been studied by researchers, and many results has been achieved [6][7][8]. For example, based on Cloude decomposition, Wang et al [9] used the local uniformity of the third eigenvalue of a polarization coherence matrix (T) to detect ships.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the drawbacks of the CFAR method, ship detection methods based on new features have been studied by researchers, and many results has been achieved [6][7][8]. For example, based on Cloude decomposition, Wang et al [9] used the local uniformity of the third eigenvalue of a polarization coherence matrix (T) to detect ships.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The azimuth offset makes AIS-SAR data matching difficult and it must be compensated for, especially in highly congested areas. The common approach for AIS-SAR data matching [17][18][19]31,32] is shown in Figure 2. Positions of vessels in AIS data, interpolated at SAR image epoch, are referred to as AIS-based ship geographic coordinates.…”
Section: Ais-based Matching Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the refinement of the situation picture is the motivation for many works applying methods of multisensor, multi-target tracking. In [16] and [30] AIS data are fused with Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery and/ or coastal radar to provide a reliable and precise situation picture for large-scale maritime surveillance. In the same context different authors, such as [7,29] and [31], have also studied the benefits of fusing multiple coastal Over-the-Horizon (OTH) radars in terms of an improved MTT performance and increased area of coverage.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%