2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11629-013-2536-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SAR image coregistration using fringe definition detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both ascending and descending tracks ALOS‐2 L‐band SAR images, acquired in the strip‐map mode, were processed using the GMTSAR software with a multilook factor of 32 × 12 (azimuth multifactor × range multilook factor) to maintain the interferometric correlation in the near‐fault zone (Sandwell et al, ; Yang et al, ). The SRTM‐4 digital elevation model was used to remove the topographic contribution from the initial interferogram.…”
Section: Data Sets and Insar Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both ascending and descending tracks ALOS‐2 L‐band SAR images, acquired in the strip‐map mode, were processed using the GMTSAR software with a multilook factor of 32 × 12 (azimuth multifactor × range multilook factor) to maintain the interferometric correlation in the near‐fault zone (Sandwell et al, ; Yang et al, ). The SRTM‐4 digital elevation model was used to remove the topographic contribution from the initial interferogram.…”
Section: Data Sets and Insar Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%