SAQC: SNP Array Quality Control

Abstract

BackgroundGenome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays containing hundreds of thousands of SNPs from the human genome have proven useful for studying important human genome questions. Data quality of SNP arrays plays a key role in the accuracy and precision of downstream data analyses. However, good indices for assessing data quality of SNP arrays have not yet been developed.ResultsWe developed new quality indices to measure the quality of SNP arrays and/or DNA samples and investigated their statistical properties. The indices quantify a departure of estimated individual-level allele frequencies (AFs) from expected frequencies via standardized distances. The proposed quality indices followed lognormal distributions in several large genomic studies that we empirically evaluated. AF reference data and quality index reference data for different SNP array platforms were established based on samples from various reference populations. Furthermore, a confidence interval method based on the underlying empirical distributions of quality indices was developed to identify poor-quality SNP arrays and/or DNA samples. Analyses of authentic biological data and simulated data show that this new method is sensitive and specific for the detection of poor-quality SNP arrays and/or DNA samples.ConclusionsThis study introduces new quality indices, establishes references for AFs and quality indices, and develops a detection method for poor-quality SNP arrays and/or DNA samples. We have developed a new computer program that utilizes these methods called SNP Array Quality Control (SAQC). SAQC software is written in R and R-GUI and was developed as a user-friendly tool for the visualization and evaluation of data quality of genome-wide SNP arrays. The program is available online (http://www.stat.sinica.edu.tw/hsinchou/genetics/quality/SAQC.htm).

Constitutive Function of the Ikaros Transcription Factor in Primary Leukemia Cells from Pediatric Newly Diagnosed High-Risk and Relapsed B-precursor ALL Patients

“…Most quality measurements provided by available software focus on single arrays and do not assess normalization across arrays to identify arrays with low signal to noise ratios or outlier distributions such as provided by gene expression arrays. The methodology to address this issue for SNP arrays has been published but is not widely used to accurately determine the prevalence of specific breakpoints in a population [ 28 ]. Furthermore, very little guidance is provided in software packages for array preprocessing, setting the parameters of signal detection, segmentation of data, signal levels arising from cross talk between alleles, setting sequence specific background signals with respect to optimizing sensitivity and specificity of CNV determination for each array and across multiple arrays.…”

Genomic selection for growth characteristics in Korean red pine (Pinus densiflora Seibold & Zucc.)

“…Ensuring the quality of the SNP array data is crucial because it significantly affects the accuracy and precision of subsequent analyses. Contaminated data may lead to false-positive or false-negative results, underscoring the importance of controlling the data quality ( Yang et al., 2011 ). Although previous studies on GS in forest trees have generally set a call rate criterion of 85–95% ( Beaulieu et al., 2014 ; Cappa et al., 2019 ; Ukrainetz and Mansfield, 2020a ), the impact of marker quality on the accuracy of GS has not been extensively explored.…”

Population structure and genetic diversity of coffee progenies derived from Catuaí and Híbrido de Timor revealed by genome-wide SNP marker

“…To ensure that only informative SNP markers were applied to C. arabica, the 11,187 SNP markers obtained with more stringent parameters (filter 3) were used in the other analyses. more accurate and safer markers were developed with the potential to generate a lower missing percentage in the populations to be analyzed and greater probability of success in determining the nitrogen bases of the SNP markers (Laurie et al 2010;Yang et al 2011).…”