2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00382.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Saprophytic growth of inoculated Frankia sp. in soil microcosms

Abstract: The potential of two Frankia strains to grow saprophytically was studied in nonsterile soil microcosms with ground leaf litter of Alnus glutinosa as the sole carbon and nitrogen sources. Strains Ag45/Mut15 and ArI3, which represent two taxonomic subgroups within the Alnus host infection group were inoculated alone, or together to investigate potential competition. Their growth was analyzed by in situ and dot-blot hybridization. A significant increase in cell numbers and filament length was observed during the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our previous analyses, only one group of frankiae, i.e., subgroup II of the Alnus host infection group represented by strain Ag45/Mut15, was detected by qPCR in both nodules on A. glutinosa and in soils, though with numbers in soils that corresponded largely to those retrieved for nitrogen-fixing frankiae [19]. This subgroup was dominant apparently independent of environmental characteristics such as organic matter content and matric potential that had been shown to affect the development of specific Frankia populations [9][10][11]31]. Our current analyses detected three of our four target subgroups within the genus demonstrating the potential of our qPCRbased quantification procedure for population analyses in soils.…”
Section: Rbwmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our previous analyses, only one group of frankiae, i.e., subgroup II of the Alnus host infection group represented by strain Ag45/Mut15, was detected by qPCR in both nodules on A. glutinosa and in soils, though with numbers in soils that corresponded largely to those retrieved for nitrogen-fixing frankiae [19]. This subgroup was dominant apparently independent of environmental characteristics such as organic matter content and matric potential that had been shown to affect the development of specific Frankia populations [9][10][11]31]. Our current analyses detected three of our four target subgroups within the genus demonstrating the potential of our qPCRbased quantification procedure for population analyses in soils.…”
Section: Rbwmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the absence of plants, amendment of soils with slowly available C resources such as leaf litter affected the nodulation capacity of different Frankia strains [11] and allowed growth of a small number of strains only, all of which belonged to a distinct phylogenetic cluster within the Alnus host infection group [9,10]. Casuarina-infective strains, another distinct phylogenetic cluster within the Alnus host infection group [12,13], also grew saprotrophically, however, only in the rhizosphere of their host plant [10] or with leaf litter of Casuarina sp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Biofilms were viewed using a Nikon Eclipse 80 I microscope. Images were obtained using a Nikon DXM 1200F digital camera and images were analysed using Image-Pro Plus (version 5.1) (Mirza et al, 2007). Adobe Photoshop CS3 (version 10.0.1) was used to convert the images to greyscale, invert the image (to make bacteria appear dark against a light background), and optimize contrast.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some evidence suggests that active Frankia populations in the soil may be preferentially selected by the host for nodulation (33,36). Previous research in our laboratory has confirmed the importance of the plant host in selecting Frankia strains for symbiosis when the same soil was inoculated into six different actinorhizal plant species and resulted in six different diversity profiles (34).…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%