2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sap flux-scaled transpiration and stomatal conductance response to soil and atmospheric drought in a semi-arid sagebrush ecosystem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
67
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(128 reference statements)
3
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sap flow can be used to reflect species-specific water consumption by plants (Ewers et al, 2002;Baldocchi, 2005;Naithani et al, 2012). Sap flow can also be used to continuously monitor canopy conductance and its response to environmental variables Naithani et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sap flow can be used to reflect species-specific water consumption by plants (Ewers et al, 2002;Baldocchi, 2005;Naithani et al, 2012). Sap flow can also be used to continuously monitor canopy conductance and its response to environmental variables Naithani et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sap flow can also be used to continuously monitor canopy conductance and its response to environmental variables Naithani et al, 2012). Biotic and abiotic effects on sap flow and transpiration are often interactive and confounded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of plant water use under a given microclimate condition generally depends on available water for plant uptake, root distribution, and species sensitivity to soil and atmospheric drought (Oren et al, 1996). It is critical to understand the water use characteristic and physiological responses of arid plant species to drought and the underlying mechanisms for accurately predicting long-term ecosystem carbon, water, and energy fluxes (Naithani et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar result was reported by Zheng and Wang 2014 for the same species. This happened much earlier than other semiarid species 0 ~ 2 h, Du et al, 2011;Naithani et al, 2012 and rain-forest species 1 ~ 4 h, Motzer et al, 2005 , indicating stronger water defi cit and larger stomatal regulation on water use of H. ammodendron. Compared to peak water use at midday commonly found in other species in mesic and semiarid regions Oren and Pataki, 2001;Tang et al, 2006, Du et al, 2011 , the whole plant water use of H. ammodendron during mid and past midday time was largely depressed, which was related to stomatal closure induced by decreased leaf water potential and whole plant hydraulic conductance under high atmospheric drought Tyree, 2003;Xu et al, 2011;Zhao, 2011 .…”
Section: Response Patterns Of G S To Climate Driversmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Mean g s at leaf scale was 20.23 mmol m 2 s 1 , which was signifi cantly higher than that at branch and whole plant scales P < 0.01 . On the other hand, the mean g s values were nearly identical to both branch and whole plant scales Naithani et al, 2012 . The different results compared to previous studies might be related to different soil water contents, climate drivers and/or plant functional traits C 3 /C 4 .…”
Section: Response Patterns Of G S To Climate Driversmentioning
confidence: 84%