2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2011.10.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sano–Tachiya–Noolandi–Hong versus Onsager modelling of charge photogeneration in organic solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commonly used models of exciton dissociation, such as the Onsager-Braun model, consider the rate of dissociation k diss electric field dependent, whereas the primary yield of geminate pair formation (n FE ) is typically assumed to be electric field independent; this assumption has been challenged in several studies. [60][61][62] We found that our data are more consistent with an electric field-dependent competition among pathways 1, 2, and, in composites, 4 of charge carrier photogeneration, which suggests field dependent parameters n SSC ; n FE , and n CT . Since the analytical function describing such competition is not known, in order to extract quantitative information about relative contributions of these different charge generation pathways to the photocurrent at various applied electric fields, we used the simplest possible linear model for the electric field dependence of these parameters, specifically…”
Section: Modelsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Commonly used models of exciton dissociation, such as the Onsager-Braun model, consider the rate of dissociation k diss electric field dependent, whereas the primary yield of geminate pair formation (n FE ) is typically assumed to be electric field independent; this assumption has been challenged in several studies. [60][61][62] We found that our data are more consistent with an electric field-dependent competition among pathways 1, 2, and, in composites, 4 of charge carrier photogeneration, which suggests field dependent parameters n SSC ; n FE , and n CT . Since the analytical function describing such competition is not known, in order to extract quantitative information about relative contributions of these different charge generation pathways to the photocurrent at various applied electric fields, we used the simplest possible linear model for the electric field dependence of these parameters, specifically…”
Section: Modelsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…(7) show that at a = 0.5 -1 nm, e 1 = 6, T eff = 500 K À 1500 K, and F = 10 7 -10 8 V/m the value of f a eq ðaÞ typically lies in the range between 0.6 Â 10 9 and 2 Â 10 10 1/m. Using parameter k a % 0.02 m/s found from the study of the 3D geminate recombination in some organic photoconductors [46], we obtain J 0 (a,t) < k a f a eq ðaÞ < 4 Â 10 8 1/s. Both flux J 0 (a,t) and flux J 0 (b,t) are seen to be far less than the presumed rate of trapping t À1 0 that justifies assumption (i) made above.…”
Section: Kinetics Of the Diffusive Barrier Crossing Of Pretrapped Chamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Here, k B is the Boltzmann constant, r 0 -the mean intrapair distance, r c = 187 Å (for a temperature T = 298 K and relative electric permittivity of an organic solid ε r = 3)-the Onsager radius, i.e., the distance at which the Coulombic electron-hole interaction in a pair is equal to the energy of k B T. The symbol P(m, x) stands for the incomplete gamma function of the integral order m. Note that the calculations of the dissociation probability based on Equation (10) are relatively simple, usually yielding satisfactory results in a wide range of electric field strengths. Nevertheless, the Ω(F) can also be determined using the Sano-Tachiya-Noolandi-Hong approximation [26,27], in which, contrary to the Onsager one, the final recombination of carriers proceeds with a finite velocity and on a sphere of a finite radius, but at the expense of fairly sophisticated and tedious mathematical manipulations (examples of calculations comparing both formalisms are given in our previous paper [28]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%