2018
DOI: 10.3390/challe9020043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sanitization of Early Life and Microbial Dysbiosis

Abstract: Childbearing and infant care practices have dramatically evolved since the 15th century. Shifting away from traditional home-based experiences, with the emergence of the microbial aware era and the hospital as a quintessential sanitizing machine, early life has now long been characterized as a condition to be medically managed. Paradoxically, this ‘germ-free’ march towards a healthier early life environment has opened the door to greater microbial susceptibility and dysbiosis. Many studies have now established… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include improvements in immune health ( Li, 2010 ; Rook, 2013 ), mental health ( Birch et al, 2020 ; Callaghan et al, 2020 ), and cardiovascular health ( Yeager et al, 2020 ). In the alternative direction (i.e., spending more time in natural environments which may help to establish more positive attitudes toward microbes), we can hypothesize that our positive attitudes toward microbes could conceivably reduce the likelihood that we carry out mass (non-targeted) sterilization of our local environments, which could also have important implications for our health ( Jun et al, 2018 ; Parks et al, 2020 ; Prescott, 2020 ; Renz and Skevaki, 2020 ). This hypothesis requires further research and would benefit from the collection of data on people’s actions (e.g., related to environmental avoidance and sterilization).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These include improvements in immune health ( Li, 2010 ; Rook, 2013 ), mental health ( Birch et al, 2020 ; Callaghan et al, 2020 ), and cardiovascular health ( Yeager et al, 2020 ). In the alternative direction (i.e., spending more time in natural environments which may help to establish more positive attitudes toward microbes), we can hypothesize that our positive attitudes toward microbes could conceivably reduce the likelihood that we carry out mass (non-targeted) sterilization of our local environments, which could also have important implications for our health ( Jun et al, 2018 ; Parks et al, 2020 ; Prescott, 2020 ; Renz and Skevaki, 2020 ). This hypothesis requires further research and would benefit from the collection of data on people’s actions (e.g., related to environmental avoidance and sterilization).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, far less than 1% of the microbes on the planet are human pathogens ( Zobell and Rittenberg, 2011 ; Balloux and van Dorp, 2017 ). Moreover, germaphobia may have contributed to the current explosion in human immune-related disorders (such as diabetes, asthma, and inflammatory bowel disease) ( Jun et al, 2018 ; Timmis et al, 2019 ). This is thought to be attributed to the notion that exposure to environmental microbiomes—the diverse network of microbes in a given environment—plays an important role in human health ( Rook et al, 2003 ; Dannemiller et al, 2014 ; Stein et al, 2016 ; Arleevskaya et al, 2019 ; Liddicoat et al, 2019 ; Selway et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include improvements in immune health (Li et al 2010;Rook, 2013), mental health (Birch et al 2020;Callaghan et al 2020), and cardiovascular health (Yao et al 2020;Yeager et al 2020). In the alternative direction (i.e., spending more time in natural environments which may help to establish more positive attitudes towards microbes), our positive attitudes towards microbes could conceivably reduce the likelihood that we carry out mass (non-targeted) sterilisation of our local environments, which could also have important implications for our health (Jun et al 2018;Parks et al 2020;Prescott, 2020;Renz and Skevaki, 2020). This relationship could also be non-dichotomous (or potentially even a virtuous loop) in the sense that our positive attitudes towards microbes may predispose us to spend more time in nature--an act that may enhance our positive attitudes towards microbes, and the feedback continues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, far less than 1% of the microbes on the planet are human pathogens (Zobell and Rittenberg, 2011;Balloux and van Dorp, 2017). Moreover, germaphobia may have contributed to the current explosion in human immune-related disorders (such as diabetes, asthma, and inflammatory bowel disease) (Jun et al 2018;Timmis et al 2019). This is thought to be attributed to the notion that exposure to environmental microbiomes -the diverse network of microbes in a given environment -plays an important role in human health (Rook et al 2003;Dannemiller et al 2014;Stein et al 2016;Arleevskaya et al 2019;Liddicoat et al 2019;Selway et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Household uses of cleaning products emit substances of concern in indoor air. However, because some users assume that infectious diseases are caused by the presence of microorganisms, seeking a high level of cleanliness can be part of a preventive logic, especially in the presence of children [67,68]. This preventive logic could be reinforced by marketing and advertising strategies, especially during the global COVID-19 pandemic.…”
Section: Risk Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%