1995
DOI: 10.1128/aem.61.2.476-480.1995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for Vibrio vulnificus hemolysin to detect V. vulnificus in environmental specimens

Abstract: Vibrio vulnificus hemolysin, purified by quantitative isoelectric focusing, was used to prepare rabbit and goat anti-hemolysin. The resulting antibodies were used as capture and detector antibody reagents in a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to detect V. vulnificus in environmental samples. By this technique, 4 laboratory-maintained V. vulnificus strains and 33 environmental V. vulnificus isolates were detected. Also, the technique distinguished five other Vibrio species from V. vulnificus, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, detection techniques have been focused on the recovery of biotype 1, usually by employing enrichment in alkaline peptone broth followed by isolation on selective media (21,27,33). Since these methods require checking of numerous colonies and are unable to recover nonculturable cells, recent molecular techniques, such as immunoassays and PCR, have been proposed to circumvent these problems (6,16,17,29,34,38). Because clinical and environmental strains of biotype 1 are phenotypically indistinguishable and possess a high degree of DNA similarity (36,39,41), all of these methods have been based on species-specific traits of V. vulnificus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, detection techniques have been focused on the recovery of biotype 1, usually by employing enrichment in alkaline peptone broth followed by isolation on selective media (21,27,33). Since these methods require checking of numerous colonies and are unable to recover nonculturable cells, recent molecular techniques, such as immunoassays and PCR, have been proposed to circumvent these problems (6,16,17,29,34,38). Because clinical and environmental strains of biotype 1 are phenotypically indistinguishable and possess a high degree of DNA similarity (36,39,41), all of these methods have been based on species-specific traits of V. vulnificus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1994 ). However, with the exception of V. vulnificus ( Parker & Lewis 1995) and V. parahaemolyticus ( Holt et al . 1994 ), contaminants of oysters, the other species of the genera are not considered to be important foodborne pathogens.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce cross鈥恟eactivity with Aeromonas strains belonging to other serogroups and with other genera, antiserum was absorbed with lyophilised cells of A. sobria CECT837 and Edwardsiella tarda CECT849 [18]. Adsorption was carried out by the Parker and Lewis [19] procedure, using a mixture of antisera from A. hydrophila EO63 and from A. hydrophila A19.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%