Proceedings of the 2014 International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2598153.2598176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sandboxed interaction for casual users in shared spaces

Abstract: A simple and natural interaction is considered the most important feature of an interface for multiple impromptu users in public spaces. Intuitiveness and forthright feedback are key factors to enable a steep learning curve for untrained users that need to grasp the interaction model in a short time span. The lack of proper constraints, designed to restrict and guide the user actions, might hinder such intuitiveness, mainly when the number of users grows or their behavior is exceedingly unrestrained.In this pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different ways of overlaying digital information over paper maps have been studied, such as using Anoto pens [8], PDAs [10], see through displays [9], projections [10], or tangible objects [3]. Maps combining tangible objects and projections have been used in exhibits [1] as they proved to be efficient for managing crowds and more attractive than virtual tools [6]. To our knowledge, none of the previous studies has systematically compared different interaction techniques for specific map functions (e.g., zooming).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different ways of overlaying digital information over paper maps have been studied, such as using Anoto pens [8], PDAs [10], see through displays [9], projections [10], or tangible objects [3]. Maps combining tangible objects and projections have been used in exhibits [1] as they proved to be efficient for managing crowds and more attractive than virtual tools [6]. To our knowledge, none of the previous studies has systematically compared different interaction techniques for specific map functions (e.g., zooming).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%