1972
DOI: 10.3133/ofr73236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sand transport by the Eel River and its effect on nearby beaches

Abstract: Introduction 7 2 Previous investigations 4 Sand transport by the Eel River near its mouth 4 Deposition of sand transported by the Eel River 9 References 16 si N, X vs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Elwha and other SMRs, sands play an important role in coastal sediment fluxes. Suspended sediments in the Elwha River on 6 March were 32–35% sand, similar to values measured in the Têt River, Eel River, and southern California rivers (~25% during storms; Bourrin et al, ; Ritter, ; Warrick & Milliman, ), and the Choshui River (35–40% during a typhoon; Milliman et al, ). Sands settle rapidly in the river‐mouth region but can also be transported limited distances seaward and reworked in longshore transport cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…For the Elwha and other SMRs, sands play an important role in coastal sediment fluxes. Suspended sediments in the Elwha River on 6 March were 32–35% sand, similar to values measured in the Têt River, Eel River, and southern California rivers (~25% during storms; Bourrin et al, ; Ritter, ; Warrick & Milliman, ), and the Choshui River (35–40% during a typhoon; Milliman et al, ). Sands settle rapidly in the river‐mouth region but can also be transported limited distances seaward and reworked in longshore transport cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Littoral drift is believed to be dominated by northern, storm-driven transport in the winter, and by southern, wind wave-driven transport in the summer (Dingler and Clifton, 1994;Winkelman et al, 1999), with net northern transport during SW storms and El Niño events (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2017a). On the basis of mean grain size and mineralogy, Ritter (1973) hypothesized that the Little and Mad Rivers provide sand to the beaches and barrier north of the Humboldt Bay inlet, while the Eel River provides sand to the south of the inlet. However, patterns of erosion above the North Jetty and accretion below the South Jetty, along with the northward migration of the spits at Mad and Little Rivers, are evidence of northward littoral drift.…”
Section: Sediment Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pattern is a consequence of hydraulic sorting by wave-generated currents, which partition terrigenous sands and muds above and below storm wave base, respectively (Fan et al, 2004). Lower Eel River suspensions contain as much as 20% sand (and nearly equal parts silt and clay; Brown and Ritter, 1971), but most of the sand initially settles near the river mouth and adjacent surf zone before being reworked to the inner shelf during storms (Ritter, 1972;Crockett and Nittrouer, 2004). Fluvial mud bypasses the inner shelf and reaches the middle shelf via surface plumes and, more important, near-bottom suspensions maintained by turbulence in the wave-boundary layer.…”
Section: Regional Setting and Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%