2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sand production model in gas hydrate-bearing sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The depressurization is typically achieved by lowering the fluid pressure below the dissociation pressure at the prevailing temperature and salinity, where pore water is continuously pumped out from target hydrate‐occurring intervals in the production well (Makogon, ). This depressurization of hydrate‐bearing sediments (HBS) not only causes multiphase fluid flows associated with hydrate dissociation, but also accompanies various emergent phenomena, including compression and mechanical failure of sediments (Kwon et al, ; Waite et al, ), sand production (Uchida et al, ), and fines migration (Jung et al, ; Lee et al, )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The depressurization is typically achieved by lowering the fluid pressure below the dissociation pressure at the prevailing temperature and salinity, where pore water is continuously pumped out from target hydrate‐occurring intervals in the production well (Makogon, ). This depressurization of hydrate‐bearing sediments (HBS) not only causes multiphase fluid flows associated with hydrate dissociation, but also accompanies various emergent phenomena, including compression and mechanical failure of sediments (Kwon et al, ; Waite et al, ), sand production (Uchida et al, ), and fines migration (Jung et al, ; Lee et al, )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The depressurization is typically achieved by lowering the fluid pressure below the dissociation pressure at the prevailing temperature and salinity, where pore water is continuously pumped out from target hydrate-occurring intervals in the production well (Makogon, 1997). This depressurization of hydrate-bearing sediments (HBS) not only causes multiphase fluid flows associated with hydrate dissociation, but also accompanies various emergent phenomena, including compression and mechanical failure of sediments (Kwon et al, 2013;Waite et al, 2010), sand production (Uchida et al, 2016), and fines migration (Jung et al, 2012;Lee et al, 2013) Moreover, recent field-scale hydrate production tests (e.g., Malik in Canada and the Nankai Trough in Japan) have demonstrated that depressurization-based hydrate production can cause severe sand production and fines migration (Yamamoto et al, 2014). In particular, fines migration refers to a phenomenon in which fine sediment particles (or fines) that are smaller than sand particles (< 75 μm) move along with the fluid in porous media.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, developing hydrate causes changes in the mechanical behaviours of hydrate layers. This leads to geomechanical problems such as wellbore instability, sand production, formation collapse and submarine landslides [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. In the petroleum industry, millions of dollars have been spent to Figure 1 shows the methane hydrate sand production and sand control simulator (MHSPSCS), which has a diameter of 200 mm and the height of 200 mm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental device consisted of a high-pressure reactor equipped with a wellbore, a temperature-controlled water bath, a production unit, a visual gas-liquid-solid three-phase separation system, a data-acquisition system, and some measurement units. Two top pressure transducers (top pore pressure and crustal stress loader pressure), a middle pressure transducer (middle pore pressure), and a bottom pressure transducer (gas production Energies 2018, 11,1673 3 of 17 pressure) were placed in the simulator. The MHSPSCS was enclosed with cooling jacket and heat exchanger tube (−253.15 to 323.15 K, ±0.1 K) to maintain the temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of their results indicated that the gas production rate is expected to increase with time and the simulated water recovery rate cannot match field measured data. In addition, the geomechanical behaviors (such as seafloor subsidence and sand production) of the marine HBS induced by gas production have been widely studied [3,7,[18][19][20][21]. The geomechanical analysis indicated that the spatial evolution of the temperature, pressure, hydrate saturation, and gas saturation is the most relevant to the geomechanical behavior of HBS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%