“…For example, in developing his curves, Ambraseys (1988) did not consider (1) deep-focus earthquakes, which produce more distal liquefaction than shallow crustal earthquakes; or (2) anomalous cases that would bias the maximum site-tosource distance of liquefaction, including those where conditions greatly enhanced liquefaction susceptibility, such as irrigated fields or sloping ground. Conversely, Castilla and Audemard (2007) included both deepfocus earthquakes and anomalous cases in developing their correlation from global data. For example, Castilla and Audemard (2007) include data from the 1977 M w 7.5 Bucharest, Romania earthquake, having a focal depth of 91-110 km (Ambraseys, 1988;Berg et al, 1980), as well Kuribayashi & Tatsuoka (1975): Japanese earthquakes Ambraseys (1988): worldwide earthquakes Papadopoulos & Lefkopoulos (1993): worldwide earthquakes Papadopoulos & Lefkopoulos (1993): Greek earthquakes Wakamatsu (1993): Japanese earthquakes Galli (2000): Italian earthquakes Aydan et al (2000): Turkish earthquakes Papathanassiou (2005): Agean regional earthquakes Pirrotta et al (2007): Sicilian regional earthquakes Castilla and Audemard (2007) as data from aftershocks following the 1989 M w 5.9 Bova del Tocuyo, Venezuela and M w 6.9 Loma Prieta, USA earthquakes.…”