Sanctioned Supervision: Voices from the Experts

Rapisarda, Clarrice A.; Britton, Paula J.

doi:10.17744/mehc.29.1.6tcdb7yga7becwmf

Cited by 8 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An intentional statewide process of selection, training, and support managed by the state counseling regulatory board or a state professional counseling association might also encourage supervisors to engage in and have a satisfying experience providing sanctioned supervision (Rapisarda & Britton, 2007). State professional associations could solicit applications from their current membership and recommend specific professionals to serve as sanctioned supervisors.…”

Section: Implications For Supervisor Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Board-mandated oversight of a counselor's practice by a colleague is typically referred to as sanctioned supervision (Rapisarda & Britton, 2007;Walzer & Miltimore, 1993), mandated supervision (Cobia & Pipes, 2002;Thomas, 2010), or monitoring (Walzer & Miltimore, 1993). The relationship between the concepts of supervision and monitoring has yet to be adequately explored in the professional literature.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although one article addressed theoretical issues associated with monitoring (i.e., Cobia & Pipes, 2002), and one study addressed nonsanctioned supervisors' reactions to the concept of monitoring (i.e., Rapisarda & Britton, 2007), no empirical research-across disciplines-has addressed the experience of individuals who have actually provided sanctioned supervision. There is a need for research that explores supervisees' and sanctioned supervisors' experiences and reactions to this unique form of supervision.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…An enhanced understanding of the sanctioned supervision process may serve to improve supervisors' ability to provide quality sanctioned supervision. Rapisarda and Britton (2007) conducted a focus group in which counselors discussed their perceptions of the effectiveness of sanctioned supervision. However, none of the members of the focus group had ever engaged in sanctioned supervision and as such, their perceptions were speculative.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The study also pointed to suggestions for enhancing the sanctioned supervision process. Rapisarda and Britton (2007) highlighted the importance of interviewing supervisors who have provided sanctioned supervision, and developing an understanding of the process that is rooted in actual experiences.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A Qualitative Study of Supervisors' Reflections on Providing Sanctioned Supervision

Kress

O'Neill

Protivnak

et al. 2015

The Clinical Supervisor

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sanctioned supervision, sometimes referred to as mandated supervision or professional monitoring, is intended to protect the public, reduce further counselor ethical/legal violations, and improve the professional practice of the counselor adjudicated for unprofessional behavior. Sanctioned supervision is a common remediation intervention required by state regulatory boards. However, there is a lack of research on the practice of sanctioned supervision and the perceptions of sanctioned supervisors. A qualitative research approach was used to better understand the experiences of four supervisors who provided sanctioned supervision within the past year as part of a state regulatory board remediation process. The main themes from the qualitative study included the following: supervisors finding the supervision process to be unique from traditional supervision, and supervisors experiencing ambivalence about the sanctioned supervision process. Practice considerations for supervisors providing sanctioned supervision are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Implications For Supervisor Practicementioning

confidence: 99%