2020
DOI: 10.51492/cfwj.106.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

San Francisco Estuary mysid abundance in the fall, and the potential for competitive advantage of Hyperacanthomysis longirostris over Neomysis mercedis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was first documented in the estuary in 1993, where it was most likely introduced via ballast water (Modlin and Orsi 1997). After its introduction, H. longirostris quickly became the most abundant mysid in the estuary, replacing the native mysid, Neomysis mercedis, as the dominant catch in the CDFW EMP Zooplankton Survey and Fall Midwater Trawl mysid trawls (Avila and Hartman 2020;Barros 2021;. Hyperacanthomysis longirostris is found throughout the upper estuary, at higher temperatures and salinities than N. mercedis, and is smaller at maturity than the native N. mercedis.…”
Section: Target Taxamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was first documented in the estuary in 1993, where it was most likely introduced via ballast water (Modlin and Orsi 1997). After its introduction, H. longirostris quickly became the most abundant mysid in the estuary, replacing the native mysid, Neomysis mercedis, as the dominant catch in the CDFW EMP Zooplankton Survey and Fall Midwater Trawl mysid trawls (Avila and Hartman 2020;Barros 2021;. Hyperacanthomysis longirostris is found throughout the upper estuary, at higher temperatures and salinities than N. mercedis, and is smaller at maturity than the native N. mercedis.…”
Section: Target Taxamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hyperacanthomysis longirostris is found throughout the upper estuary, at higher temperatures and salinities than N. mercedis, and is smaller at maturity than the native N. mercedis. (Avila and Hartman 2020).…”
Section: Target Taxamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metabolic theory of ecology predicts shrinking ectotherm body size with increasing temperatures because body size and temperature affect the metabolic rate of ectotherms (Brown et al 2004). Evidence for shrinking body sizes in the upper estuary with warming temperatures has been limited to invertebrate communities (Bouley and Kimmerer 2006;Avila and Hartman 2020) and a few fish species (Chinook Salmon smolts, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha; Munsch et al 2019;Yanagitsuru et al 2021), and warming temperatures are expected to further reduce the growth window of fishes like Delta Smelt (Brown et al 2016). However, a declining food base for pelagic fishes, in part from the invasion of non-native taxa (e.g., Potamocorbula amurensis, Corbicula fluminea; Feyrer et al 2003;Greene et al 2011;Lucas and Thompson 2012), may exacerbate the shrinking effects of a warmer climate in the upper estuary as found for other ectothermic communities (Crozier et al 2010;Cross et al 2015;O'Gorman et al 2016;Nelson et al 2017).…”
Section: Climate Change Effects On Delta Smelt In the Upper Estuarymentioning
confidence: 99%