Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Networking, Information Systems &Amp; Security 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3386723.3387899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling techniques for Arabic Sentiment Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sudanese vocabulary is mostly inspired by MSA, but with important Greek, Turkish and English modifications to the phonology. The morphology of Sudanese words shares many features with MSA, but the method of dialect inflection is Saudi (3C) 90+10 CNN 86.54% [43] Moroccan (2C) 90+10 Majority Voting 83.45% [23] Egyptian, Iraqi and Levantine (3C) 80+10+10 LSTM 71.4 % [6] Jordanian (2C) 90+10 Ensemble 93.4% [5] Lebanon (2C) 80+20 LR 89.80% [1] Algerian (2C) 85+15 SVM 0.86% [31] Tunisian (2C) 80+10+10 Deep-LSTM 90.00% [31] JEG, TAC and TSAC (2C) 90+10 Tw-StAR 82.08% [25] Egyptian, MSA (2C)(n-C) 80+10+10 MC1, MC2 92.96% [7] Modern Standard Arabic 85+15 BiGRU 94.32% [3] Modern Standard Arabic 80+20 RF+SMOTE 96.00% more complicated than MSA in some respects [20]. Following a thorough study of such dialect differences, we have created two datasets based on social media posts, built a CNN-based model for sentiment analyis, and applied it to the datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sudanese vocabulary is mostly inspired by MSA, but with important Greek, Turkish and English modifications to the phonology. The morphology of Sudanese words shares many features with MSA, but the method of dialect inflection is Saudi (3C) 90+10 CNN 86.54% [43] Moroccan (2C) 90+10 Majority Voting 83.45% [23] Egyptian, Iraqi and Levantine (3C) 80+10+10 LSTM 71.4 % [6] Jordanian (2C) 90+10 Ensemble 93.4% [5] Lebanon (2C) 80+20 LR 89.80% [1] Algerian (2C) 85+15 SVM 0.86% [31] Tunisian (2C) 80+10+10 Deep-LSTM 90.00% [31] JEG, TAC and TSAC (2C) 90+10 Tw-StAR 82.08% [25] Egyptian, MSA (2C)(n-C) 80+10+10 MC1, MC2 92.96% [7] Modern Standard Arabic 85+15 BiGRU 94.32% [3] Modern Standard Arabic 80+20 RF+SMOTE 96.00% more complicated than MSA in some respects [20]. Following a thorough study of such dialect differences, we have created two datasets based on social media posts, built a CNN-based model for sentiment analyis, and applied it to the datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because it is evidenced in literature that SVM has great or better performance in different domains such as hotel review (Addi et al 2020;Said & Muqrashi, 2020), education (Guo et al 2020), health (Rasool et al 2020;Adamu et al 2021), movie review (Sharma & Dey, 2012), stock selection (Liu et al 2020) and stock price movement (Sagala et al 2020). SVM has also been shown to perform better than other machine learning models (Bouchlaghem et al 2016;Addi et al 2020) and deep learning models such as CNN, RNN (Alayba et al 2017;Al-Smadi et al 2018), Bi-LSTM (Xing et al 2020) and LSTM (Salehin et al 2020). Xing et al (2020) conducted their study in the financial context, and they showed SVM performed equally well as BERT and performed better than Bi-LSTM.…”
Section: Rq3 Can Machine or Deep Learning Models Perform As An Off-th...mentioning
confidence: 99%