2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling technique for launcher impact safety zone estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the more calculations are performed, the more accurately the DR is determined. In the study [25], the authors emphasized this point. They stated that, when dealing with uncommon events with probabilities below 10 −2 , 500 Monte Carlo simulations are obviously not appropriate but can be employed for events with probabilities higher than 0.1.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Methods and Alternative Optionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Consequently, the more calculations are performed, the more accurately the DR is determined. In the study [25], the authors emphasized this point. They stated that, when dealing with uncommon events with probabilities below 10 −2 , 500 Monte Carlo simulations are obviously not appropriate but can be employed for events with probabilities higher than 0.1.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Methods and Alternative Optionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This paper considers an uncertain model that estimates the fall-back positions of a space launcher. In this paper, this spatial launcher is a solid rocket booster [31] that is the first stage of a space launcher. Its weight is about 30 000 kg and the launch point is at 50 km height with a slope of 30 degrees.…”
Section: Fall-back Positioning Of a Space Launcher Stagementioning
confidence: 99%