2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2013
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2013.335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling Strategies for Real-Time Action Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
68
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…They show that such a technique performs significantly better than the original STIP detectors. Shi et al [19] proposed that with proper sampling density, a state-of-the-art performance can be achieved by randomly discarding up to 92% of densely sampled interest points.…”
Section: Interest Point Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They show that such a technique performs significantly better than the original STIP detectors. Shi et al [19] proposed that with proper sampling density, a state-of-the-art performance can be achieved by randomly discarding up to 92% of densely sampled interest points.…”
Section: Interest Point Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feature vectors in some of these channels can also be as high as 3-8 times than those used in original dense trajectories or our proposed ordered trajectories. Shi et al 2013 [19] suggested that random selection of 10,000 dense trajectories can yield 83.3% and 47.6%, respectively. By our proposed technique, we see that only less important information such as background is omitted, as shown visually in a few examples in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their method however, uses low-level features for body-part estimation and hierarchical segmentation, and thus lacks robustness which limits their use for complex datasets. Most of these methods are predominantly global recognition methods and are not well-suited for use in the recognition of complex activities; however, methods like [12,30,36,44] that have performed relatively well on complex datasets have indirectly built coarse mid-level representations from low-level features.…”
Section: Low-level Descriptors For Activity Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introduced by [16], sparse space-time interest points and subsequent methods, such as local ternary patterns [41], joint sparse representations [12], dense interest points [37,30], better motion cues [14] and discriminative class-specific features [15], typically compute a bag-of-words representation out of local features and use them for classification. The work of [35] uses densely rather than sparsely sampled trajectories for better performance, and [36] builds upon this work to incorporate more types of low-level features while also accounting for camera motion.…”
Section: Low-level Descriptors For Activity Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparative studies [19,21,23] are devoted to these different sampling methods, which have a great influence on the results. Hence, this step is also the first and key part of our work.…”
Section: Constructing Local Patch Vectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%