2008
DOI: 10.5194/fr-11-7-2008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling-standardized expansion and collapse of reef building in the Phanerozoic

Abstract: Tracing the variability of reef production over long temporal scales is important to approach natural processes favoring or suppressing reef growth. Raw compilations of reef abundance per unit of time do not necessarily depict biologically meaningful patterns, because the waxing and waning of reefs might just follow the quality of the fossil record, that is, the amount of paleontological information that is available in general. Here I standardize the published record of Phanerozoic reefs, as stored in the Pal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Archaeocyathid reefs were locally abundant during the early stages of the Cambrian and could have generated important regional engineering effects, but they disappeared in the middle Cambrian. Overall, reefs were relatively insignificant compared to reefs later in the Paleozoic (Kiessling 2008). Bulldozing and bioturbation also increased, with planar laminated sediments essentially disappearing as nearshore marine sediments became well mixed by burrowing organisms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Archaeocyathid reefs were locally abundant during the early stages of the Cambrian and could have generated important regional engineering effects, but they disappeared in the middle Cambrian. Overall, reefs were relatively insignificant compared to reefs later in the Paleozoic (Kiessling 2008). Bulldozing and bioturbation also increased, with planar laminated sediments essentially disappearing as nearshore marine sediments became well mixed by burrowing organisms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…in the Valanginian and Aptian) that saw a dramatic reduction in the production of carbonates [ 52 , 53 ], and potentially decreased the amount of habitable areas for shallow-marine dwelling crocodyliforms. Furthermore, there is evidence that the global drop in eustatic sea level at the J/K boundary decimated reef environments [ 54 , 55 ], and there were elevated extinction rates for sessile groups of cephalopods, bivalves and gastropods at low palaeolatitudes [ 20 , 32 , 56 ]. These events culminated in several episodes of intense ocean water stagnation and anoxia, including the Valanginian Weissert carbon isotope excursion and the late Hauterivian Faraoni oceanic anoxic events [ 52 , 53 , 57 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coral diversity appears to have increased linearly through the J/K boundary based on subsampled estimates (Alroy, 2010b); however, Kiessling (2008) found a substantial reef expansion in the early Late Jurassic, followed by a comparable decline in the latest Jurassic and over the J/K boundary (see also . In the Late Jurassic, low-latitude shallow marine regions were dominated by scleractinian coral reefs (Leinfelder, 2001;Martin-Garin, Lathuliere & Geister, 2012), with sea level exerting a strong control on their regional distribution (Bambach, 2006).…”
Section: (C) Reefsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The proportion of evaporitic rocks in the Late Jurassic parallels this sea-level pattern (Ronov et al, 1980;Zorina et al, 2008). Falling sea levels through the J/K transition decimated reef environments, as indicated by a marked decline in the areal extent and latest Jurassic diversity of reef-building organisms (Kiessling, 2008;Foote, 2014). Black shales were widely deposited throughout the Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous, often in marginal seas (Dypvik & Zakharov, 2012; 2012; Meyers, 2014).…”
Section: (2) Sea Level and Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation