2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2018.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling root exudates – Mission impossible?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
256
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 285 publications
(269 citation statements)
references
References 234 publications
0
256
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To aid in more definitive identification of exuded metabolites, modern practices employ a mixture of sampling techniques (hydroponic and aeroponic exudate collection methods), coupled with highresolution mass profiling (such as LC-MS combined with standard libraries and MS e fragmentation spectra) for rigorous assessment of plant exudate metabolomics (Kuijken et al, 2014;van Dam & Bouwmeester, 2016;Oburger & Jones, 2018). Although hydroponic collection methods are direct, they are limited by the artificial growth environment, affecting root physiology and morphology (Oburger & Jones, 2018). Alternatively, samples taken from natural soils can be marred by high chemical complexity (this noise originates from the soil, the plant and/or microbially associated metabolites), confounding identification of the origin of derived metabolites.…”
Section: Box 1 a Case For Using Mixed Methodologies In Root Exudate Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To aid in more definitive identification of exuded metabolites, modern practices employ a mixture of sampling techniques (hydroponic and aeroponic exudate collection methods), coupled with highresolution mass profiling (such as LC-MS combined with standard libraries and MS e fragmentation spectra) for rigorous assessment of plant exudate metabolomics (Kuijken et al, 2014;van Dam & Bouwmeester, 2016;Oburger & Jones, 2018). Although hydroponic collection methods are direct, they are limited by the artificial growth environment, affecting root physiology and morphology (Oburger & Jones, 2018). Alternatively, samples taken from natural soils can be marred by high chemical complexity (this noise originates from the soil, the plant and/or microbially associated metabolites), confounding identification of the origin of derived metabolites.…”
Section: Box 1 a Case For Using Mixed Methodologies In Root Exudate Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite early studies highlighting the role of faunal–microbial interactions in the rhizosphere for the mineralization and plant uptake of soil N (Clarholm, ; Ingham, Trofymow, Ingham, & Coleman, ; Ritz & Griffiths, ), major uncertainties exist about the influence of plant exudates on nutrient release via these trophic interactions (Blagodatskaya et al, ; Cole, Staddon, Sleep, & Bardgett, ). Our poor ability to measure the spectrum and amounts of root exudates in soil in a quantitatively rigorous manner (Oburger & Jones, ) calls for further research to overcome this bottleneck. In the case of priming, it is highly likely that both negative and positive priming will occur in different regions of the root system (due to spatial patterns of root exudation, microbial activity and soil organic C and N heterogeneity).…”
Section: Priming Soil Organic Matter Decomposition By Micro‐organismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This set-up allows for disentangling the implications of differences in the quantity and quality of root exudates, as well as differences in soil properties and microbial communities, for respiration, which is not possible using 13 CO 2 pulse labelling. However, root exudates collected and readded in aqueous solution to isolated soil samples might well behave differently than in an undisturbed rhizosphere (Oburger et al, 2013;Oburger & Jones, 2018). Ideally, our method would be combined with 13 CO 2 pulse labelling and flux measurements in an intact system, as well as detailed analysis of 13 C-enriched root exudate metabolites and microbial communities.…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%