2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(03)00089-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling rate effects on surface EMG timing and amplitude measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This would present a problem if we were interested in analyzing the spectral distribution of the EMG signals, but since we are only interested in the smoothed moving average of the signal, we rely on results showing that smoothed surface EMG signals sampled well below the Nyquist limit are almost identical to those sampled at or above the Nyquist sampling rate [38]. Another reason that the undersampling does not leave us with unusable data is that the signal we are interested in (the smooth outline that results from the moving average) is time domain encoded rather than frequency domain encoded.…”
Section: Data Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would present a problem if we were interested in analyzing the spectral distribution of the EMG signals, but since we are only interested in the smoothed moving average of the signal, we rely on results showing that smoothed surface EMG signals sampled well below the Nyquist limit are almost identical to those sampled at or above the Nyquist sampling rate [38]. Another reason that the undersampling does not leave us with unusable data is that the signal we are interested in (the smooth outline that results from the moving average) is time domain encoded rather than frequency domain encoded.…”
Section: Data Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Staude [22] found this method identified signals within a 100 ms window with a 99.9% of accuracy and a mean error of -7.1 ms for time sensitive signals. One standard deviation above the mean baseline magnitude lasting greater than 25 ms criterion had a strong likelihood of committing a Type I error [20,21] while 3 standard deviations cutoff resulted in a Type II error [20,24]. The current study established the time of muscle onset (ONSET) as the time when the signal was two standard deviations above the mean baseline magnitude, lasting 25 ms and with a signal-to-noise ratio of greater than four.…”
Section: Detectionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…To determine the onset of muscle activity, several methods can be adopted including the single threshold, double threshold, likelihood ratio, Shewhart and mean EMG difference protocols, and Bayesian change-point analysis [3,7,9,[20][21][22][23][24]. The current study selected the Shewhart single threshold criterion method to identified muscle onset.…”
Section: Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hz) to meet the Nyquist rate (two times higher signal frequency) and avoid the so called aliasing [37]. However, it is known that oversampling above this critical Nyquist rate does not significantly improve the signal quality [38], but will likely lead to higher cost and size of the sensor.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%