ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual 2000
DOI: 10.1016/b978-012327645-2/50006-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling, preservation, enumeration and biomass of marine protozooplankton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specimens were identified to the level of order and enumerated. An average of 960 individuals were counted per sample and we estimated an enumeration error of 6.4 % (Gifford and Caron, 2000). The category copepod nauplii comprised a mix of calanoid, cyclopoid, and poecilostomatoid copepods.…”
Section: Zooplankton Sampling and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specimens were identified to the level of order and enumerated. An average of 960 individuals were counted per sample and we estimated an enumeration error of 6.4 % (Gifford and Caron, 2000). The category copepod nauplii comprised a mix of calanoid, cyclopoid, and poecilostomatoid copepods.…”
Section: Zooplankton Sampling and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microplankton samples were processed and analyzed according to Gifford and Caron (2000) and carbon content was calculated according to Putt and Stoecker (1989) for ciliates and Lessard (1991) for heterotrophic dinoflagellates.…”
Section: 2microzooplanktonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore no coincidence that attempts to analyze the DNA sequence from preserved microplankton samples focused mainly on alveolate taxa, i.e., organisms presumably with a high copy number of the SSU rRNA gene (dinoflagellates [5,11,13,29]; ciliates [9]). Still, despite the presumably high gene copy number in the alveolates investigated so far, success with field samples is usually low.Among the most common fixatives for microalgae and protists are formaldehyde and Lugol's iodine solution (12,20,32). Formaldehyde-preserved samples are generally problematic for molecular analyses, as formaldehyde may cause severe cell loss (e.g., reference 20 and references therein).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the most common fixatives for microalgae and protists are formaldehyde and Lugol's iodine solution (12,20,32). Formaldehyde-preserved samples are generally problematic for molecular analyses, as formaldehyde may cause severe cell loss (e.g., reference 20 and references therein).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%