2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2018.8593735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling of Pareto-Optimal Trajectories Using Progressive Objective Evaluation in Multi-Objective Motion Planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the requirement of a user-preferred direction is not assumed in our work. In [25] a Pareto front approximation is proposed using Markov chain random walks. Their goal is to uniformly place samples on the Pareto front, while our goal is to minimize error in the space of Pareto-optimal costs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the requirement of a user-preferred direction is not assumed in our work. In [25] a Pareto front approximation is proposed using Markov chain random walks. Their goal is to uniformly place samples on the Pareto front, while our goal is to minimize error in the space of Pareto-optimal costs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a set of quantitative objectives and system model, the goal of multi-objective analysis is to calculate the set of all optimal trade-offs between the objectives, called the Pareto front. Recent studies explore applications in robotics [9], path planning [10], [11], multi-agent coordination [12]- [14], and sensor scheduling [15]. The latter specifically focuses on resource and performance objectives and develops a scheduling framework for the usage of a high precision, high cost sensor.…”
Section: {Firstnamelastname}@coloradoedumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…c) Approximating Pareto-fronts: Given the wide-spread applications of multi-objective optimization, several fundamental techniques for computing Pareto-fronts have been studied over the years [9], [20]- [23]. However, popular approaches such as gradient descent methods, evolutionary algorithms [9] or random walks [25] assume that objective values can be easily obtained and thus make use of frequently evaluating the objectives for different parameters. Computing MRPD solutions is computationally burdensome even when using heuristic solutions, making such approaches impractical.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%