2016
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2015.2507546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling of Graph Signals With Successive Local Aggregations

Abstract: Abstract-A new scheme to sample signals defined in the nodes of a graph is proposed. The underlying assumption is that such signals admit a sparse representation in a frequency domain related to the structure of the graph, which is captured by the so-called graph-shift operator. Most of the works that have looked at this problem have focused on using the value of the signal observed at a subset of nodes to recover the signal in the entire graph. Differently, the sampling scheme proposed here uses as input obse… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
271
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(274 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
271
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim is to have at least K linearly independent equations, so that the matrix C(I ⊗ (ΨEK ))Ῡ has full column rank and the original signal x can be recovered using the pseudoinverse. Beyond invertibility, taking additional samples improves the recovery performance in the presence of noise [9]. Although space limitations prevent us to present the details here, the structure in (5) can be used to design optimal sampling and recovery schemes that minimize the effects of the noise.…”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The aim is to have at least K linearly independent equations, so that the matrix C(I ⊗ (ΨEK ))Ῡ has full column rank and the original signal x can be recovered using the pseudoinverse. Beyond invertibility, taking additional samples improves the recovery performance in the presence of noise [9]. Although space limitations prevent us to present the details here, the structure in (5) can be used to design optimal sampling and recovery schemes that minimize the effects of the noise.…”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, identifiability is guaranteed whenever C(I ⊗ Ψ)Υ is full spark and contains at least 2K rows [15]. For specific forms of C, the full-spark condition can be assessed by a quick inspection of {λi} N i=1 and V; see [9,10] for the case of aggregation sampling.…”
Section: Joint Recovery and Support Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It extends classical signal processing concepts such as signals, filters, Fourier transform, frequency response, low-and highpass filtering, from signals residing on regular lattices to data residing on general graphs; for example, a graph signal models the data value assigned to each node in a graph. Recent work involves sampling for graph signals [9], [10], [11], [12], recovery for graph signals [13], [14], [15], [16], representations for graph signals [17], [18] principles on graphs [19], [20], stationary graph signal processing [21], [22], graph dictionary construction [23], graph-based filter banks [24], [25], [26], [27], denoising on graphs [24], [28], community detection and clustering on graphs [29], [30], [31], distributed computing [32], [33] and graph-based transforms [34], [35], [36]. We here consider detecting localized categorical attributes on graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by the local aggregation sampling procedure in [5], we propose two reconstruction -interpolation -schemes where the signal is injected at a single node and percolates throughout the graph via successive applications of the graph shift operator. In Sec.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%