2017
DOI: 10.3390/f8010028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling Method and Tree-Age Affect Soil Organic C and N Contents in Larch Plantations

Abstract: Abstract:We currently have a poor understanding of how different soil sampling methods (pedogenetic horizon versus fixed-depth) influence the evaluation of soil properties. Here, 159 soil profiles were sampled from larch (Larix gmelinii) plantations in northeast China using both the pedogenetic horizon and fixed-depth sampling methods. Analysis of variance was used to determine how sampling method influences the assessment of the spatial variation in the concentration and storage of soil organic C (SOC) and N … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional incompatibility issues arise due to whether soil is sampled by depth or horizon and how (or if) bulk density is used as the parameter to calculate SOC stocks [7,187,188]. In general, sampling by horizon is recommended for studying pedogenic controls on soil properties, while sampling by depth is recommended for nutrition-based studies because it requires a smaller sampling size for a given error limit [189,190]. Calculating SOC stocks using the mass-based approach is commonly recommended to avoid confounding effects caused by land-use-or management-related changes in bulk density over time [88,[191][192][193][194][195].…”
Section: Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional incompatibility issues arise due to whether soil is sampled by depth or horizon and how (or if) bulk density is used as the parameter to calculate SOC stocks [7,187,188]. In general, sampling by horizon is recommended for studying pedogenic controls on soil properties, while sampling by depth is recommended for nutrition-based studies because it requires a smaller sampling size for a given error limit [189,190]. Calculating SOC stocks using the mass-based approach is commonly recommended to avoid confounding effects caused by land-use-or management-related changes in bulk density over time [88,[191][192][193][194][195].…”
Section: Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with hardwood species, conifer species resulted in lower SOC stocks when excluding forest floor and litters (Guo & Gifford, 2002;Laganiere, Angers, & Pare, 2010;Paul, Polglase, Nyakuengama, & Khanna, 2002), but previous studies have not considered the role of aggregates stability and C/N stoichiometry. Furthermore, large inter-site variations of soil properties (Boca et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2016) possibly obscure inter-species effects (Wang, Wang, & Chang, 2017). It is possible to compare broadleaf and conifer species by designing experiments within a single site (Cha, Cha, & Oh, 2019;Kooch, Rostayee, & Hosseini, 2016;Sariyildiz et al, 2015;Tang & Li, 2013), but when multiple-species were across large-scale sites, the site variations need to be statistically excluded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors are the main reasons for changes in forest SOC, soil respiration, temperature stability and turnover during urbanization processes. Furthermore, in a large-scale field survey, a proper statistical method facilitates clarification of the complex interaction of multiple factors on the response function [25]. An integrated approach including correlation analysis and regression analysis [22] can be used to obtain reliable results and explanations of such variations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%