1984
DOI: 10.1080/00031305.1984.10483208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling from a Discrete Distribution While Preserving Monotonicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting CDF is therefore reflective of the shaped beam, and sampling from this shaped beam distribution eliminates the inefficient step of tracking particles through the secondary collimators. As a result of the large number of discrete fluence values in the CDF an efficient sampling algorithm, the cut-point method, 19,20 is used for generating a random sample from the discrete distribution. Once the source particle's position has been chosen, the particle's energy is sampled from the cumulative bremsstrahlung distribution of the nearest ring or point detector.…”
Section: Beam Characterization and Reconstruction Of The Phase Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting CDF is therefore reflective of the shaped beam, and sampling from this shaped beam distribution eliminates the inefficient step of tracking particles through the secondary collimators. As a result of the large number of discrete fluence values in the CDF an efficient sampling algorithm, the cut-point method, 19,20 is used for generating a random sample from the discrete distribution. Once the source particle's position has been chosen, the particle's energy is sampled from the cumulative bremsstrahlung distribution of the nearest ring or point detector.…”
Section: Beam Characterization and Reconstruction Of The Phase Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is the time to sample a capacity state B U) = b {l) from [P{b); b 6 fi) and the other is the time to determine A(6 (() ) and thereby <t>(b 0) . Both the alias method (Walker [14]) and the cutpoint method (Fishman and Moore [4]) allow this sampling in O(n) time. Once the capacity state b (l) is given, A(b u) ) can be determined via a maximal flow algorithm.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall time and space both are 0(n) . By a dynamic version of the guide table method (see [3] or [13], for the raw guide table method}, D (lag n ) expected space is achievable provided that we can update the guide table in 0(1) amortized time . This is easy to achieve if we take care to rebuild the table every log nth (or mth) entry .…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%