2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-6055.2011.00836.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling forest canopy arthropod biodiversity with three novel minimal‐cost trap designs

Abstract: Sampling arthropods in the upper canopy of tall trees presents a range of challenges associated with portability, cost, placement, replication and collection. Detailed schematics and instructions are presented here for three trap designs: sticky CD cases, plastic bottle hanging flight-intercept traps and drink bottleneck funnel crawl traps. By using simple and salvageable materials such as plastic drink bottles and compact disc cases, the financial cost of an arthropod sampling regime in the crowns of old-grow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only well-studied agricultural pest in this regard is the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say), as adults walk into agricultural fields from surrounding habitats (Boiteau et al, 2003). Traps to monitor the abundance and movement of arthropods walking on standing trees in forest ecosystems were used by Bar-Ness et al (2012), Hanula & New (1996), Moeed & Meads (1983), and Pinz on & Spence (2008), and in an agricultural system by Mulder et al (1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only well-studied agricultural pest in this regard is the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say), as adults walk into agricultural fields from surrounding habitats (Boiteau et al, 2003). Traps to monitor the abundance and movement of arthropods walking on standing trees in forest ecosystems were used by Bar-Ness et al (2012), Hanula & New (1996), Moeed & Meads (1983), and Pinz on & Spence (2008), and in an agricultural system by Mulder et al (1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A list of the attributes of the canopy trap is presented in Table 3 for ease of comparison with other sampling methods (see Bar‐Ness et al . 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this trap, the initial cost of a reusable unit is higher than single‐use trapping techniques, such as sticky and funnel traps, which can cost under A$1 per unit (Bar‐Ness et al . 2012). However, net cost‐benefit for our reusable design improves after each use due to the decrease in ongoing costs (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental design, scientific questions, and management practices should not be determined by the methods and modes of accessing tree canopies. The community of scientists who study the biology of tree canopies originally had to overcome tremendous obstacles and recent developments are both a cause and a consequence of creative methods for accessing tree canopies (Barker and Sutton, 1997). Even today, most people working with trees state that their canopy access is limited and if they had effective and accurate equipment, they would routinely collect samples from the arboreal ecosystem.…”
Section: Future Goals and Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%