2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-55754-6_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling Distributed Schedulers for Resilient Space Communication

Abstract: We consider routing in delay-tolerant networks like satellite constellations with known but intermittent contacts, random message loss, and resource-constrained nodes. Using a Markov decision process model, we seek a forwarding strategy that maximises the probability of delivering a message given a bound on the network-wide number of message copies. Standard probabilistic model checking would compute strategies that use global information, which are not implementable since nodes can only act on local data. In … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scheduler sampling implementation in modes further complements the abilities of mcsta where the latter fails due to state space explosion. It provides significantly more useful results than other tools that have to rely on a single scheduler such as the uniform randomised one, and can in this way, e.g., disprove safety or provide implementable strategies [29] where other tools cannot. Still, it is important to keep its limitations, in particular, the inability to quantify the optimality of the sampled scheduler and thus, e.g., prove safety, in mind.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scheduler sampling implementation in modes further complements the abilities of mcsta where the latter fails due to state space explosion. It provides significantly more useful results than other tools that have to rely on a single scheduler such as the uniform randomised one, and can in this way, e.g., disprove safety or provide implementable strategies [29] where other tools cannot. Still, it is important to keep its limitations, in particular, the inability to quantify the optimality of the sampled scheduler and thus, e.g., prove safety, in mind.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial CGR reliability studies followed in 2017. Dr. Juan Fraire et al showed how CGR behaved under uncertain contact plans [87], [88], for which reliable CGR variations based on state-of-the-art computer science models were introduced [89]- [91]. As discussed in Section VII, scalability as well as uncertain and opportunistic CGR extensions are among the most active and promising research lines in CGR.…”
Section: Contact Graph Routingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have proposed formal methods to model these probabilistic routing and copy-based forwarding questions [90]. The probabilistic contact plan may be modeled as a Markov Decision Process (MDP), from which optimal copybased routing policies can be obtained [91].…”
Section: B Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments were performed with a CubETH nanosatellite [22] and low Earth orbit observation satellite show that this incrementally-built model can reduce the number of testing required in later stages of the design. Some examples of probabilistic verification are [23][24][25]. In [23], a realistic use case of routing in a Walker satellite constellation (i.e., in circular orbits and with the same period and inclination) in low Earth orbit is verified using probabilistic model checking.…”
Section: Model Checkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some examples of probabilistic verification are [23][24][25]. In [23], a realistic use case of routing in a Walker satellite constellation (i.e., in circular orbits and with the same period and inclination) in low Earth orbit is verified using probabilistic model checking. The approach consists of using distributed schedulers that can only make use of local data.…”
Section: Model Checkingmentioning
confidence: 99%