2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling compliance for cortisol upon awakening in children and adolescents

Abstract: SummaryCompliance with awakening salivary sampling is important for precise measurement of the diurnal cortisol profile. During childhood and adolescence, developmental factors influence sampling upon awakening (awake 0 ) due to school routine, sleep/wake patterns, and age related cortisol changes. In the present study, children and adolescents' sampling compliance of awakening cortisol was evaluated using accelerometry. Children and adolescents (N = 201; 45.3% female; 8-18 years; M age = 12.68 years, SD = 2.0… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(62 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants recorded the date and time each sample was taken in a daily log, which was initialed by parents or teachers as a marker of compliance (97% of log entries initialed by parent/teacher). Compliance was also verified for the awakening (awake 0 ) sample using accelerometry data (supine to sitting; Rotenberg & McGrath, 2014). Consistent with previous adult findings, most participants (88.1%) collected the awake 0 sample within 15 min of the accelerometer-based wake-time (Dockray et al, 2008;DeSantis et al, 2011) and 91% of the participants collected the awake 0, awake 30 , and awake 45 samples within one hour post awakening; further details on compliance can be found in Rotenberg & McGrath (2014).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Participants recorded the date and time each sample was taken in a daily log, which was initialed by parents or teachers as a marker of compliance (97% of log entries initialed by parent/teacher). Compliance was also verified for the awakening (awake 0 ) sample using accelerometry data (supine to sitting; Rotenberg & McGrath, 2014). Consistent with previous adult findings, most participants (88.1%) collected the awake 0 sample within 15 min of the accelerometer-based wake-time (Dockray et al, 2008;DeSantis et al, 2011) and 91% of the participants collected the awake 0, awake 30 , and awake 45 samples within one hour post awakening; further details on compliance can be found in Rotenberg & McGrath (2014).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…A second limitation is related to the issue of compliance. Sampling compliance (e.g., refrain from eating, brushing teeth, drinking; timing of collection; coding and storage of samples) is essential for the precise measurement of salivary cortisol profiles, and a lack of compliance is a potential source of variance (Dockray, Bhattacharyya, Molloy, & Steptoe, 2008; Rotenberg & McGrath, 2014). Recall, that a parent or caretaker collected the home-based samples and that special care was taken to insure compliance with the saliva collection protocol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salivary cortisol sampling is simple, quick, noninvasive, and can be collected in a naturalistic setting such as the home, classroom or playground (Gunnar, 1992; Kirschbaum & Hellhammer, 1999). Even infants, toddlers and young children are able to provide salivary cortisol samples suitable for laboratory analysis (Gunnar, 1992; Hanrahan, McCarthy, Kleiber, Lutgendorf, & Tsalikian, 2006; Rotenberg & McGrath, 2014; Turner-Cobb, Rixon, & Jessop, 2008). Moreover, numerous studies have demonstrated the utility of salivary cortisol for the measurement of stress in typically developing children (Gunnar, 1992) and in children with various chronic health conditions such as autism spectrum disorders (Corbett et al, 2008; Corbett et al, 2014), chronic fatigue syndrome (Heim et al, 2009; Nijhof et al, 2014), affective disorders (Dahl et al, 1991; Pervanidou et al, 2013; Russ et al, 2012), asthma (Buske-Kirschbaum et al, 1997), child maltreatment (Tarullo & Gunnar, 2006), and social deprivation or early adversity (Gunnar, Morison, Chisholm, & Schuder, 2001; Koss et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each sample was initialled by parents or teachers as a measure of compliance. Previous research has demonstrated good compliance with saliva sampling protocols in youth (Rotenberg and McGrath, 2014). Youth were instructed to store saliva samples in the freezer at home until they returned them to the laboratory.…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Missing values were imputed 20 times with re-sampling techniques to derive aggregate cortisol indices. This method was previously used in a study examining cortisol in youth (Rotenberg and McGrath, 2014). Regression analyses were conducted to examine (1) the relation between stressful experiences (i.e., perceived stress, stressful life events) and diurnal cortisol, (2) the relation between stressful experiences and sleep, and (3) the relation between sleep and diurnal cortisol.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%