2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling bias of invasive gibel carp and threatened crucian carp: Implications for conservation

Kiran Thomas,
Marek Brabec,
Sandip Tapkir
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 107 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) using fish traps (25 × 25 × 45 cm; 4 mm mesh size with two small funnel-shaped entrances of 6 cm diameter at each end) and "umbrella traps" (95 cm diameter, 8 small funnel-shaped entrances) baited with a combination of dog food pellets and bread slices. The nets (two fish traps and two umbrella traps) were set before sunset (5−7 pm) and checked in the morning (9−11 am, approximately 15 hours of exposure) (Thomas et al 2023). The fish caught were then measured (SL; mm) and weighed (W; g).…”
Section: Field Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) using fish traps (25 × 25 × 45 cm; 4 mm mesh size with two small funnel-shaped entrances of 6 cm diameter at each end) and "umbrella traps" (95 cm diameter, 8 small funnel-shaped entrances) baited with a combination of dog food pellets and bread slices. The nets (two fish traps and two umbrella traps) were set before sunset (5−7 pm) and checked in the morning (9−11 am, approximately 15 hours of exposure) (Thomas et al 2023). The fish caught were then measured (SL; mm) and weighed (W; g).…”
Section: Field Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%