The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2015.7402330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling-based Minimum Risk path planning in multiobjective configuration spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scale factor parameter sf meas is intended to model this. The FPAA's complexity can be estimated as (16) where d is the solution length.…”
Section: A Complexity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scale factor parameter sf meas is intended to model this. The FPAA's complexity can be estimated as (16) where d is the solution length.…”
Section: A Complexity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous Multi-Objective path planning has been accomplished using techniques such as genetic algorithms [10], Pareto fronts [11], A* [12], Multi-Step A* [13], Multi-Objective D* lite [14], Rapidly Exploring Random Tree (RRT) based algorithms [15], [16], Neuromorphic systems [17], and Dijkstra's algorithm [11], [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is intended to capture problems in which robots must manage resources such as collision risk, access to valuable measurements or following certain rules, which are present in some regions of the environment, and absent in others. For example, [12] proposed a sampled-based planning algorithm for minimum risk planning. Risk is only penalized in the regions of the environment where collision is possible.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motion planners typically optimize solutions over path distance, time, and obstacle/terrain avoidance with benchmarks as discussed in [13]. Recent papers have presented flight risk metrics that augment traditional distance/time/obstacle avoidance cost terms [14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%