2015
DOI: 10.4000/volume.4439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling as Political Practice

Abstract: This article seeks to put in perspective Gilberto Gil’s Brazilian cultural policy from 2003 to 2008 as a pioneer attempt to institutionally legitimate musical cultures involving sampling and remix. Mutations brought about by the digital age call for strong reflections upon the concept of “digital culture” enacted for instance in sampling and remix practices, and incarnated in a complex manner by the cultural “glocal” laboratories of underground musical cultures in Brazil. The study of Gil’s policy involves a m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The movement was struggling with organizing without governmental support, which was plenty during Gilberto Gil's lead of Brazil's Ministry of Culture (2003Culture ( -2008. Gilberto Gil, who is also a pioneer in using Creative Commons to license artistic works (Garcia-Solek, 2015), envisioned a network of organized producers working with free software, but not every group pursued this vision. Once his term was over and governmental support ran out, these groups did not have money to pay for the technological and spatial costs of organizing in that way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The movement was struggling with organizing without governmental support, which was plenty during Gilberto Gil's lead of Brazil's Ministry of Culture (2003Culture ( -2008. Gilberto Gil, who is also a pioneer in using Creative Commons to license artistic works (Garcia-Solek, 2015), envisioned a network of organized producers working with free software, but not every group pursued this vision. Once his term was over and governmental support ran out, these groups did not have money to pay for the technological and spatial costs of organizing in that way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%