1991
DOI: 10.1080/00288330.1991.9516483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling and preservation methods for the quantitative enumeration of microzooplankton

Abstract: Four sampling and four preservation techniques were compared for the quantitative enumeration of microzooplankton (ciliates, rotifers, and nauplii) in a eutrophic lake and in an oligotrophic lake. Counts of most microzooplankton groups were significantly higher in samples preserved with Lugol's iodine and mercuric chloride than with formalin and glutaraldehyde. The collection of samples with nets or pumps, and the concentration of samples with nylon screens gave significantly lower counts than discrete settled… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Being an important link between primary producers and secondary consumers, zooplankton play an important role in aquatic ecosystems (James 1991). Hence a change in the zooplankton community will affect the entire ecosystem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being an important link between primary producers and secondary consumers, zooplankton play an important role in aquatic ecosystems (James 1991). Hence a change in the zooplankton community will affect the entire ecosystem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…picophytoplankton (Hansen et al 1994, Peters 1994, or predation by larger zooplankton species (Froneman et al 1996). It should be pointed out, however, that the use of Lugol's solution to fix the microplankton samples may have resulted in the underestimation of the contribution of dinoflagellates to total cell counts (James 1991, Leakey et al 1994. Also, we were unable to differentiate between the autotrophic and heterotrophic components of the microplankton assemblages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…For counting, the entire plankton sample was searched for species occurring in very low numbers (particularly Piona and Anisops species, which occurred in the plankton only sporadically), and then subsampled for the abundant taxa. The sample was diluted to a known volume, stirred using a figureof-eight motion, and a 5 ml subsample withdrawn using a wide-mouthed automatic pipette, minimising vortices and thus avoiding unrepresentative subsamples (James 1991). Zooplankton numbers were then counted at a magnification of 31.5x using a stereomicroscope.…”
Section: Laboratory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%