The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(97)00072-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling and analysis of terpenes in air. An interlaboratory comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible therefore that these species may be lost to condensed water during sample collection or during the transfer of collected samples between wet and dry sample tubes. In addition, it is known that significant errors associated with the quantification of reactive and oxygenated compounds can arise (Larsen et al, 1997). The oxygenated species found here were not quantified due to uncertainty in their quantitative transfer.…”
Section: Monoterpenesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is possible therefore that these species may be lost to condensed water during sample collection or during the transfer of collected samples between wet and dry sample tubes. In addition, it is known that significant errors associated with the quantification of reactive and oxygenated compounds can arise (Larsen et al, 1997). The oxygenated species found here were not quantified due to uncertainty in their quantitative transfer.…”
Section: Monoterpenesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…No in-line ozone scrubber was used, so it is acknowledged that there may have been uncharacterised losses of the reactive VOC from oxidation by ozone during the sampling and/or other on-tube interactions/rearrangements (Larsen et al, 1997;Helmig, 1997;Pollmann et al, 2005). The co-current collection of these samples (which occurred on 2 days out of the 4 week campaign) was only for the purposes of a spot inter-comparison against the continuous PTR-MS data, and to provide an indication of speciation between α-pinene and β-pinene, which the PTR-MS cannot distinguish.…”
Section: Supplementary Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the monoterpenes are easily isomerized in stainless-steel cans, excessively heated metal transfer lines, and during storage or thermal desorption from adsorbent sampling traps. Therefore measured ratios of monoterpene emissions may be altered from their actual emission ratio (Larsen et al, 1997). For instance, -pinene and -pinene can be isomerized during analysis, forming camphene and possibly other monoterpenes in the process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may partially account for its absence or low levels in enclosure or rural air measurements (Larsen et al, 1997). The sesquiterpene -caryophyllene is often undetected unless O is scrubbed from enclosure purge air (Helmig, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%