2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-78133-4_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampled Walk and Binary Fitness Landscapes Exploration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When this factor is increased by a small gap, important variable contribute more to the ruggedness. Interestingly, while ruggedness level is low, it seems higher around important variables, possibly indicating these landscapes are globally smooth but locally rugged, as some UBQP landscapes [21]. Except for the subproblems C i , PUBO i parameters strongly impact the neutrality level of important variables.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When this factor is increased by a small gap, important variable contribute more to the ruggedness. Interestingly, while ruggedness level is low, it seems higher around important variables, possibly indicating these landscapes are globally smooth but locally rugged, as some UBQP landscapes [21]. Except for the subproblems C i , PUBO i parameters strongly impact the neutrality level of important variables.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landscape analysis of optimisation problems provides a mechanism for explaining algorithm behaviour and identifying classes of problems that are suited to particular algorithms. Studies that describe the use of landscape analysis for understanding algorithm behaviour include: explaining evolutionary algorithm behaviour in dynamic environments [8] and the dynamics in coevolutionary games [12]; understanding the behaviour of local search algorithms [105,106]; explaining performance differences between search-andscore algorithms for learning Bayesian network structures [107]; explaining the effect of different mutation operators [108] and different function sets [109] in genetic programming; explaining the performance of different real-valued evolutionary algorithms [87]; explaining the performance of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms [52,110]; understanding evolvability in grammatical evolution [111]; understanding the effect of funnels in the landscape on metaheuristic performance [112]; and explaining the performance of evolutionary algorithms in generating unit tests for software [93].…”
Section: Understanding and Explaining Algorithm Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The autocorrelation of fitness introduced by Weinberger [25] defines the correlation of fitness values during a random walk. The correlation value and the autocorrelation length give a measure of the ruggedness of the landscape [26]. Besides, the accuracy of the autocorrelation coefficients is defined by 1 2 √ , where is the length of the random walk [27].…”
Section: Fitness Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%