2003
DOI: 10.1086/345846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample Variance Considerations for Cluster Surveys

Abstract: We present a general statistical framework for describing the effect of sample variance in the number counts of virialized objects and examine its effect on cosmological parameter estimation. Specifically, we consider effects of sample variance on the power spectrum normalization and properties of dark energy extracted from current and future local and high-redshift samples of clusters. We show that for future surveys that probe ever lower cluster masses and temperatures, sample variance is generally comparabl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
552
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 438 publications
(574 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(90 reference statements)
20
552
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As explained above, this study is motivated by the need for such covariance matrices to compare any survey with theory. This extends over some previous works, which only considered the sample variance of number counts (Hu & Kravtsov 2003) or neglected high-order or non-Gaussian terms in the sample variance of estimators for two-point correlations or power spectra (Feldman et al 1994;Majumdar & Mohr 2004;Eisenstein et al 2005;Cohn 2006;Crocce et al 2011). Indeed, while the sample variance of number counts (i.e., the mean number of objects per unit volume) only involves the twopoint correlation of the objects, the sample variance of estimators of the two-point correlation itself also involves the threeand four-point correlations (and so on for estimators of higher order correlation functions) (Bernstein 1994).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…As explained above, this study is motivated by the need for such covariance matrices to compare any survey with theory. This extends over some previous works, which only considered the sample variance of number counts (Hu & Kravtsov 2003) or neglected high-order or non-Gaussian terms in the sample variance of estimators for two-point correlations or power spectra (Feldman et al 1994;Majumdar & Mohr 2004;Eisenstein et al 2005;Cohn 2006;Crocce et al 2011). Indeed, while the sample variance of number counts (i.e., the mean number of objects per unit volume) only involves the twopoint correlation of the objects, the sample variance of estimators of the two-point correlation itself also involves the threeand four-point correlations (and so on for estimators of higher order correlation functions) (Bernstein 1994).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Assuming halo masses can be adequately measured, the statistical error in cluster abundances is the sum in quadrature of Poisson noise and sample variance (Hu and Kravtsov, 2003),…”
Section: Expected Numbers and Cosmological Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By assuming a specific form of halo density profiles, we can rescale mass definitions from the virial mass M vir to M 200 , the mass definition used in the simulation measurements, as outlined in [32] (again, all overdensities are referred to the background matter density). We use this approach to compare the scaling relation predictions to the simulations in §V.…”
Section: Halo Model Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%