2013
DOI: 10.1017/s1431927613013913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample Thickness Determination by Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy at Low Electron Energies

Abstract: Sample thickness is a decisive parameter for any quantification of image information and composition in transmission electron microscopy. In this context, we present a method to determine the local sample thickness by scanning transmission electron microscopy at primary energies below 30 keV. The image intensity is measured with respect to the intensity of the incident electron beam and can be directly compared with Monte Carlo simulations. Screened Rutherford and Mott scattering cross-sections are evaluated w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thickness of the gutter layer estimated from gas permeation measurements according to Equations (3) to (16) for the studied gases corresponds well to the thickness values determined from SEM micrographs [42] as shown in Table 3: 105 nm for Stamp 1-2 and 150 nm for Stamp 2-2 (Figure 8a,b respectively). If the uncertainty of the porous layer thickness will be taken into account and the thickness δ ps will be reduced by 25% (Scenario 2) the average thickness of the gutter layer δ G will, according to our model, increase from 140 to 150 nm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The thickness of the gutter layer estimated from gas permeation measurements according to Equations (3) to (16) for the studied gases corresponds well to the thickness values determined from SEM micrographs [42] as shown in Table 3: 105 nm for Stamp 1-2 and 150 nm for Stamp 2-2 (Figure 8a,b respectively). If the uncertainty of the porous layer thickness will be taken into account and the thickness δ ps will be reduced by 25% (Scenario 2) the average thickness of the gutter layer δ G will, according to our model, increase from 140 to 150 nm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…They differ in the incorporated physical models, the possibilities for sample definition, data exporting, or computed physical characteristics. The principle of quantitative STEM imaging is described in more detail in [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial marginal interest in low-energy STEM in SEM can be partly attributed to the fact that resolution has been limited to about 1 nm. However, the benefits of the technique have been recognized and this has led to the improvement of the BF-STEM resolution into the sub-nanometer range where lattice fringes with a distance of 0.34 nm and below were resolved (Van Ngo et al, 2007; Michael et al, 2009; Konno et al, 2014). In addition to the improvement of resolution, additional capabilities are necessary to develop STEM in a SEMs into a complete characterization technique for thin specimens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%