2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample storage for soil enzyme activity and bacterial community profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the cited literature, we assume that the microbial biomass and its activity can be correctly estimated from dried-rewetted soil samples, provided that a recovery incubation period of at least two weeks is performed before any analysis. Conversely, and still based on the literature, we conclude that such a recovery period may be insufficient to study more specific properties of the soil microflora, like functional and structural profiling (DNA, enzymes, FAME, fungi/bacteria ratio; Gordon et al, 2008;Lee et al, 2007;Pesaro et al, 2004;Wallenius et al, 2010). Both conclusions may require further investigations to be confirmed for a larger range of soil and land-use types.…”
Section: Methodological Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Based on the cited literature, we assume that the microbial biomass and its activity can be correctly estimated from dried-rewetted soil samples, provided that a recovery incubation period of at least two weeks is performed before any analysis. Conversely, and still based on the literature, we conclude that such a recovery period may be insufficient to study more specific properties of the soil microflora, like functional and structural profiling (DNA, enzymes, FAME, fungi/bacteria ratio; Gordon et al, 2008;Lee et al, 2007;Pesaro et al, 2004;Wallenius et al, 2010). Both conclusions may require further investigations to be confirmed for a larger range of soil and land-use types.…”
Section: Methodological Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This allowed us a comparison between sampling regions since all samples were collected under similar weather conditions. Previous work determined only small effects on enzyme activities as a result of freezing samples (DeForest, 2009;Wallenius et al, 2010;Abellan et al, 2011). The activities of ␤-glucosidase, ␤-xylosidase, ␣-glucosidase, Nacetyl-glucosaminidase, l-aminopeptidase and phosphatase were measured according to the method of Marx et al (2001).…”
Section: Enzyme Assaysmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The bottles were then stored at À20 C, until analysis. According to Wallenius et al (2010), the freezing of soil samples retains the enzyme activity and structure of the bacterial community relatively well.…”
Section: The Response Of Soil Enzyme Activities To Terpenes (In Vivo mentioning
confidence: 99%