2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2007.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample-specific (universal) metric approaches for determining the sex of immature human skeletal remains using permanent tooth dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
69
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(46 reference statements)
3
69
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of Cardoso (2008) study are encouraging and suggest that it may be relatively easy to sex commingled skeletons. First, his method avoids the use of metric references that are not specific to the context that is being examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results of Cardoso (2008) study are encouraging and suggest that it may be relatively easy to sex commingled skeletons. First, his method avoids the use of metric references that are not specific to the context that is being examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…His results indicate that the bucco-lingual diameter (BLD) of the permanent canine provides the best sex allocation (100% for the upper canine and 86% for the lower canine). Others also found a very significant sexual dimorphism in the BLD of canines in samples of individuals of known-sex (Yamada and Sakai 1992;Işcan and Kedici, 2003;Cardoso 2008;Rai et al 2008;Ruengdit et al 2011;Zorba et al 2011) and on an archaeological sample of individuals whose sex could be ascertained from their pelves and long bones (Ditch and Rose, 1972). In contrast, Vodanovic et al (2007) failed to do this in a sample of medieval Croatians of unknown sex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cardoso (2008) indicates that, for both adult and subadults, the canines are the pieces that have greater sexual dimorphism. For Rösing (1983), the teeth are only one of the elements that are developed with the adult size and that his dimorphic morphological character is maintained over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%