2008
DOI: 10.1002/9781444300710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample Size Tables for Clinical Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
662
0
29

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 747 publications
(720 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
662
0
29
Order By: Relevance
“…Using previous reports of the frequency of symptomatic hypoglycaemia in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes [2], we assumed that 60% of type 2 diabetic patients treated with sulfonylureas would experience at least one episode during CGMS monitoring. To show that the difference in the proportion of hypoglycaemic incidents experienced between the two groups of interest was within 15%, and assuming four ordered categories for the event data (0, 1, 2, and more than two events), the study required 120 patients for the two main groups of interest to achieve 80% power at a one-sided significance level of 5% [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using previous reports of the frequency of symptomatic hypoglycaemia in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes [2], we assumed that 60% of type 2 diabetic patients treated with sulfonylureas would experience at least one episode during CGMS monitoring. To show that the difference in the proportion of hypoglycaemic incidents experienced between the two groups of interest was within 15%, and assuming four ordered categories for the event data (0, 1, 2, and more than two events), the study required 120 patients for the two main groups of interest to achieve 80% power at a one-sided significance level of 5% [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sample size greater than or equal to 123 allowed detection of correlations superior or equal to 0.25, based on an alpha significance level of 5% and power of 80% [45]. Independent variables whose bivariate test results had a P value lower than 0.05 were retained for stepwise multiple regression analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study was cross-sectional, and the sample size was not sufficient (n = 155) to detect correlations smaller than 0.25 for a P value of 0.05 and power of 80% [45] or evaluate the stability of our models. Finally, some items of the measurement tools were similar and might partly explain some relationships, especially for social participation and the environment.…”
Section: Study Limitations and Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previously published data by Tuncok et al, a power calculation suggested that 80% power could be achieved with five animals in each group if an average difference in mean arterial pressure (MAP) was 10 mmHg at the completion of the protocol, assuming standard deviations of 5 mmHg (5.1% of average baseline MAP of 103 mmHg) [19]. With standard deviations of 10 mmHg, a difference in MAP of 20 mmHg would need to be seen [20,21]. However, in that study, both control and treatment groups had improvement in MAP.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%