Sample size requirements for the internal validation of psychiatric scales

Abstract

To cite this version:Alexandra Rouquette, Bruno Falissard. Sample size requirements for the internal validation of psychiatric scales.. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, Wiley, 2011, 20 (4) Abstract:The ratio of subjects to variables (N/p), as a rule to calculate the sample size required in internal validity studies on measurement scales, has been recommended without any strict theoretical or empirical basis being provided. The purpose of the present study was to develop a tool to determine sample size for these studies in the field of psychiatry. First, a literature review was carried out to identify the distinctive features of psychiatric scales. Then, two simulation methods were developed to generate data according to: 1/ the model for factor structure derived from the literature review and 2/ a real dataset. This enabled the study of the quality of solutions obtained from principal component analysis or Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) on various sample sizes. Lastly, the influence of sample size on the precision of Cronbach"s alpha coefficient was examined. The N/p ratio rule is not upheld by this study: short scales do not allow smaller sample size. As a rule of thumb, if one"s aim is to reveal the factor structure, a minimum of 300 subjects is generally acceptable but should be increased when the number of factors within the scale is large, when EFA is used and when the number of items is small.

Development of a French version of the Endometriosis Health Profile 5 (EHP-5): cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation

“…The calculation of the number of participants required for psychometric validation was based on the confidence interval of Cronbach's alpha [9]. Considering that the EHP-5 has a total of 11 items (5 ?…”

Opening the Black-Box in Lifelong E-Learning for Employability: A Framework for a Socio-Technical E-Learning Employability System of Measurement (STELEM)

“…Because of its importance, other more restrictive conditions were also satisfied: population of 300 or more, and a theoretical model sub-sample of 200 or more [193,194]. Table 9 shows the results of the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.…”

Internal consistency, factor structure and construct validity of the French version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture

“…However, the achieved sample size (>1000) is sufficient for a multivariate analysis of 42 items and an expected number of 12 latent variables, both to satisfy the rule of 10 observations per variable20 and more recent suggestions that a minimum of 300–400 observations is required 21…”