2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample size matters for Al88Fe7Gd5 metallic glass: Smaller is stronger

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
49
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The shear offsets seen on the pillars' surfaces in the accompanying micrographs suggest that the pop-ins in these stress-strain curves correspond to shear banding events. That these pillars deform by shear localization is consistent with past reports on the microcompression testing of metallic glass pillars with diameters [1 lm [41][42][43][44]. In most tests, only a single pop-in was observed, followed by pillar failure but occasionally tests captured multiple pop-in events, separated by regions of continued elastic deformation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The shear offsets seen on the pillars' surfaces in the accompanying micrographs suggest that the pop-ins in these stress-strain curves correspond to shear banding events. That these pillars deform by shear localization is consistent with past reports on the microcompression testing of metallic glass pillars with diameters [1 lm [41][42][43][44]. In most tests, only a single pop-in was observed, followed by pillar failure but occasionally tests captured multiple pop-in events, separated by regions of continued elastic deformation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The actual elastic energy release during the load drop caused by the propagation of shear band instead of total energy stored in the sample is used in this model. It was interesting to note that the resulting simple power law fits other published strength data for a number of MG systems, too (see Figure 3 [22]). [14], [20], and [21] respectively.…”
Section: Strength-size Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…They demonstrated that when the sample size falls in between 100 nm to a few micron meters, Al 88 Fe 7 Gd 5 MG does exhibit obvious size strengthening behavior. In view of their experiment data, Wang et al [22] proposed a shifted-D −0.5 power law dependence of strength with decreasing sample diameter based on a modified energy-balance model to explain the stress-size relationship. The actual elastic energy release during the load drop caused by the propagation of shear band instead of total energy stored in the sample is used in this model.…”
Section: Strength-size Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations