Sample Size for Assessing Agreement between Two Methods of Measurement by Bland−Altman Method

Abstract

The Bland-Altman method has been widely used for assessing agreement between two methods of measurement. However, it remains unsolved about sample size estimation. We propose a new method of sample size estimation for Bland-Altman agreement assessment. According to the Bland-Altman method, the conclusion on agreement is made based on the width of the confidence interval for LOAs (limits of agreement) in comparison to predefined clinical agreement limit. Under the theory of statistical inference, the formulae of sample size estimation are derived, which depended on the pre-determined level of α, β, the mean and the standard deviation of differences between two measurements, and the predefined limits. With this new method, the sample sizes are calculated under different parameter settings which occur frequently in method comparison studies, and Monte-Carlo simulation is used to obtain the corresponding powers. The results of Monte-Carlo simulation showed that the achieved powers could coincide with the pre-determined level of powers, thus validating the correctness of the method. The method of sample size estimation can be applied in the Bland-Altman method to assess agreement between two methods of measurement.

An international collaborative study to compare different von Willebrand factor glycoprotein Ib binding activity assays: the COMPASS‐VWF study

“…The mean of 95 such CV values is shown in Table . Our sample size ( n = 95) has 90% power to prove agreement at the significance level of 0.05, with no difference ( μ / σ = 0), allowing for a standardized agreement limit ( δ / σ ) of 2.6, or 80% power to prove agreement with a standardized difference of 0.1 ( μ / σ = 0.1), where σ is the standard deviation (SD) of the measurements, μ is the mean difference between methods and δ is the limit of agreement.…”

Utility of transesophageal echocardiography for intra‐operatively assessing pulmonary artery pressure across an isolated ventricular septal defect in children

“…17 In our preliminary trial (unpublished data), the mean difference ± SD between the invasive and noninvasive measurements was 3.65 ± 2.21 mmHg. 17 In our preliminary trial (unpublished data), the mean difference ± SD between the invasive and noninvasive measurements was 3.65 ± 2.21 mmHg.…”

Determination of the optimal depth of a left internal jugular venous catheter in infants: A prospective observational study

“…Generally, the right IJV is used for central venous catheter placement in adults because of the straight course to the SVC, more superficial positioning, less overlap with the common carotid artery, and a wider diameter than the left IJV . However, the placement of a central venous catheter in small children and infants is technically difficult and has a higher complication rate than for adults . Therefore, alternative cannulation sites are frequently considered in clinical situations.…”