1996
DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3906.1258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample Size Effects on Temporal Reliability of Language Sample Measures of Preschool Children

Abstract: The present study examined the temporal reliability of four quantitative measurements of operationally defined linguistic behaviors observed in a naturalistic setting. The measures of language production were computed using the Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT) software from two 20-minute language samples obtained 3 to 14 days apart for each of 20 preschool-aged children. Samples were edited to different sizes based either on duration (12 or 20 minutes) or on limits of the total number of comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
1
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
67
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some researchers have found short samples to be reliable (Heilmann, Nockerts, & Miller, 2010), Gavin and Giles (1996) stated that temporal reliability of language sample measures required longer samples (≥ 175 complete and intelligible utterances or 20 minutes).…”
Section: Picture Book Task (Present Progressive)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some researchers have found short samples to be reliable (Heilmann, Nockerts, & Miller, 2010), Gavin and Giles (1996) stated that temporal reliability of language sample measures required longer samples (≥ 175 complete and intelligible utterances or 20 minutes).…”
Section: Picture Book Task (Present Progressive)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although evidence regarding the reliability of productive language-sample measures has been mixed, especially from shorter samples (e.g., Gavin & Giles, 1996;Tilstra & McMaster, 2007), such measures have been associated with evidence of validity through developmental change with age up through age 13 years (Miller et al, 2005;Miller, Freiberg, Holland, & Reeves, 1992; M. L. Rice, Redmond, & Hoffman, 2006); correlation with other measures of linguistic complexity (DeThorne et al, 2008;Nippold, 2009;Nippold et al, 2014; M. L. Rice et al, 2006;Ukrainetz & Blomquist, 2002); and differentiation of clinical groups (e.g., Condouris, Meyer, & Tager-Flusberg, 2003;Scott & Windsor, 2000;Watkins, Kelly, Harbers, & Hollis, 1995).…”
Section: Mlumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken together, with the exception of Gavin and Giles (1996), these studies support a conclusion that at least 80 to 100 utterances are needed for MLU to demonstrate acceptable reliability within a given sample (Cole et al, 1989;Darley & Moll, 1960) or between two samples over time (Cole et al, 1989). However, none of these studies indicate what sample size was required for total number of words or number of different words in order to demonstrate acceptable reliabilities within a given sample, although 50 utterances has been recommended in the literature as the sample size for computing these lexical measures (e.g., Miller, 1981).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, different criteria have been used to interpret the magnitude of correlation coefficients, which makes it difficult to compare across studies. Following previous studies (Bogue, DeThorne, & Schaefer, 2014;Gavin & Giles, 1996;McCauley & Swisher, 1984), we consider a correlation coefficient of .90 or higher to be acceptable in interpreting the reliability data. This criterion has been adopted because a correlation coefficient of .90 means that no more than 20% (i.e., 1 − 0.90 2 = 0.19) of the variability in children's performance on a given measure can be attributed to measurement error.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation